To: MD4Bush
I notice you only posted the private emails you received from NCPAC without your responses. Verrrry interesting. Why not post your part in the conversation for context? Perhaps it would show that you were "baiting"?
I suspect that you are, yourself, a Washington Post reporter, or are closely associated to the reporters who broke this manufactured story. At the very least, not identifying yourself as such is a serious ethical lapse. But of course, we've come to expect 'ethical lapses' from the old media.
It's very likely that the owners of this site can track down who you are, and the fact that you publicly posted emails sent to you in private without the consent of the party that sent them may open you up to criminal charges. Hope you know a good lawyer.
41 posted on
02/11/2005 9:41:01 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc sign, vinces †)
To: Antoninus
Does anyone think that JimRob should waive his privacy policy in this case and release the identity of MD4Bush, since the poster obviously was acting in bad faith? We should discuss the pros and cons of this.
44 posted on
02/11/2005 9:43:32 AM PST by
dirtboy
(Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson