Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Palladin; MistyCA
Tapes that have not surfaced..witnesses we have not heard from..and she seems to show up where there is sexual harassment. She has a resume of pretty impressive places of employment. She should be able to work just about anywhere if she is in deed qualified for the positions she so seeks. So why go running back to FOX..if she was being harassed. She was so happy to be back !!!

Yes, money would make it so much easier to deal with life. Oh, the continued "pain and suffering" she seem to find herself in even at CNN. Amazing how someone will put up with such "painful suffering" when if the cards are played right could be very lucrative in the end.

You are assuming she even was good enough to even keep her job in TV or any other media for that matter to suggest such an income. Maybe she fell under the Peter (Paula) Principle. Maybe she is a bimbo. Maybe she is an opportunist. Maybe she is stalking him? Maybe she is Mother Theresa. You don't know. Since when do we trust anything written in the media with no way to check or know true facts pertaining to this alleged harassment by The Factor.

If she is credible she will not settle outside of court. She will carry it to the end..and the doors of opportunity will open wide and welcome her with open arms for taking on The Factor.

I admit I could be wrong. But I have questions.
28 posted on 10/14/2004 8:30:29 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: MistyCA

PING

Lend your skills to this.


29 posted on 10/14/2004 8:31:44 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay; Palladin; Lijahsbubbe; ladyinred
(END VIDEOTAPE) CARROLL: O'Reilly says Mackris' lawsuit is politically motivated. Saying her attorney's firm made contributions to the Democratic Party. Mackris' attorney says the extortion complaint is without merit. And his client's complaint is not political, it's sexual harassment and the allegations against O'Reilly will be proven in court -- Lou.

DOBBS: Very high-stakes conflict between these two. Jason, what is the next step here?

CARROLL: Well, sometime in late October, October 22, both of the sides will get together and if there is an issue about the tapes, perhaps at that time, that issue will be resolved.

DOBBS: Thank you very much, Jason Carroll.

34 posted on 10/14/2004 8:48:29 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

My understanding of these charges she leveled is that O'Reilly was talking dirty to her over the phone! For God's sake, the woman doesn't know how to hang the friggen phone up? What a crock!


37 posted on 10/14/2004 9:32:05 PM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

"Tapes that have not surfaced..witnesses we have not heard from... "

You expect all this BEFORE the trial--BEFORE O'Reilly's attorneys even answer the complaint?

These are things that happen in due time, during discovery, and at depositions.


52 posted on 10/15/2004 1:33:32 PM PDT by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson