Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BushisTheMan
I think you are reaching for an argument. I know who has worked here the longest, the same itme, or less time. I know what their job classifications are. I know what salaries they start both men and women at. Do you? If not, then butt out.

"Butt out"?

In case you haven't noticed, this is not your living room and you are not dealing with your children or your husband. This is FreeRepublic and it's purpose is to have debate on issues, especially the falsehood of many Democrat talking points that are nothing but B.S.

If you can't tolerate having your statements challenged in debate, you really don't belong here.

If it is true that your company starts men and women with the same experience and qualifications at different salaries simply because of their gender and maintains that discrimination throughout it's work force, then your company is in violation of Federal law.

If that is the case, why are you just whining and playing the poor little female victim on an Internet Forum instead of filing charges against your company with the Feds?

"Poor me. I'm a female and I'm the victim of the evil male patriarchy. I can't complain or have Federal law applied because Federal law does not apply to utterly helpless females victims like me and to the other poor helpless female victims I work with. Boo Hoo Hoo...."

Your story does not pass the smell test.

72 posted on 10/25/2004 9:46:02 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Polybius

Placeholder bump, this is getting good.


73 posted on 10/25/2004 10:34:45 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Polybius

See what I mean? This woman can barely construct a response, let alone see your point. I've been dealing with her complete inability to defend her blanket statement that 'Women are paid less than men for performing the SAME job' for multiple posts, asking her just to answer the questions I asked, questions that would either demonstrate the utility of or demolish her example, and yet she just wants to trade insults.

Seems pretty obvious how those questions would be answered, based upon her evasive 'answers.'


75 posted on 10/25/2004 2:52:54 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Polybius

I guess you missed the part where my company had to adjust my salary to not be subject to the law you are referring to.


76 posted on 10/25/2004 2:54:13 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson