Posted on 10/13/2004 11:17:25 PM PDT by PowerPro
Not sure how to classify this but Steve Malzberg is discussing the Lipscomb article RIGHT NOW
Will you link me to the show?
I cannot get my computer to connect to it.
You need Real Player, I'm running version 10 over broadband. Go to wabcradio.com and click on "Listen Live."
Heard it.. cool ;=)
Real player. Damn.
I have windows media player.
Real player gives me fits.
Girl you were great! You said everything we were talking about. Plugging FR was genus too.
Now you gotta ping everyone to Sundays show.
Me too. But WABC is my link to Rush and Sean.
It's devastating....but needs to be widely reported. Hannity and Brit could do that.
"It's devastating....but needs to be widely reported. Hannity and Brit could do that."
Yes! And if we tell them Steve gave it airtime then they will too. One up the other guy works every time.
As I recall, it took several days for Hume to report on the Swift Boat Vets (beyond a momentary mention in the Grapevine).
If this story develops a leg, Hume will provide the other one.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 3 of Amendment 14 (adopted in 1868) states:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
SWEET!
Kerry is done! Great post! Thank you.
"If this story develops a leg, Hume will provide the other one."
Well you know Hume- when Steve covered this on his show he couldn't keep up with all the callers.
I think you might want to take a long look at this story.
heehee!
LOL Now you have another caller talking about you. See you are famous now.
If the 'Rats win the presidential election and Kerry is prohibited from assuming office due to Section 3 of Amendment XIV, I'll gladly (well, not very gladly) take Edwards instead. And, Kerry would be booted out of the Senate. A presidential pardon by Carter cannot substitute for the Constitutionally required two-thirds vote of each house of Congress. Kerry not in either the White House or the Senate--that's a great price to pay for having to put up with Edwards for four years.
Okay - for those of you who didn't hear it and were actually interested in what I said, posted below is an audio link of my conversation with Steve Malzberg:
(this is me crossing my fingers hoping this link will work...)
Ok - it didn't work.
So I'll post it on my own site!
http://www.powerpromoz.com
Just click on the streaming audio buttons right above the Google search option near the bottom...
Hannity said on his show yesterday that the has the article and needs to further into it further before taking it on air.
(Bet Dan wishes he'd thought of doing that.)
"Forget about the Bush 'october surprise' for a minute - think of what hillary has up her sleves. She didn't run for NY senate just to stay in DC for awhile..."
Hillary wants Kerry to win. Think about it. A Kerry presidency will be horrific. Hillary will run against Kerry in the 2008 primary. Who would a rat rather see in office. Hillary or Kerry?
Hillary has more to lose with Bush in office. If Bush keeps the country moving, in 2008, a Republican would more than likely take the WH. With Kerry, we already know things will get worse. In comes Hillary to rescue the party, with a RAT infrastructure already in place.
I thought Schieffer's giggles were the most bizarre part of the evening-seconded by Kerry's slander of Cheney's daughter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.