Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior_G
Sounds very plausible, and seems obvious that the woman tape recorded lengthy stretches of conversation with O'Reilly.

It will be obvious if such tape recordings are produced and vetted.

If O'Reilly thought the woman could back up her claims, why didn't he pay her off instead of filing the extortion suit? Do you think that he was guilty, and just assumed she wouldn't have evidence?

631 posted on 10/13/2004 4:42:42 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experiments are the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear
If O'Reilly thought the woman could back up her claims, why didn't he pay her off instead of filing the extortion suit? Do you think that he was guilty, and just assumed she wouldn't have evidence?

I think that even if you're guilty, $60M is a lot of money-----especially if what you're accused of doesn't go beyond verbal indecency. O'Reilly seems like a proud guy. I can see how the thought of caving in to an extortionist harpie might be unpalatable to him.

715 posted on 10/13/2004 5:14:39 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson