Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix Believed Iraq Dossier Was 'Understated'
The Scotsman ^ | October 12, 2004 | Gavin Cordon

Posted on 10/13/2004 12:03:55 PM PDT by quidnunc

Former UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix believed the Government’s controversial Iraq weapons dossier actually understated the case against Saddam Hussein, according to documents released today by the Foreign Office.

The papers released by the FO show that British officials at the United Nations in New York showed a draft of the dossier to Dr Blix in September 2002, two weeks before the final version was published.

A note from one official, Adam Bye, said that Dr Blix had liked the section on chemical, biological and nuclear weapons as he believed that it did not exaggerate the facts.

According to the note, Dr Blix said that the dossier even risked understating Iraq’s ability to produce weapons of mass destruction — particularly the lethal anthrax virus.

He also described the claim that even if Iraq was able to acquire fissile material from abroad, it would still take at least two years to build a working nuclear bomb as “modest”.

Since war, Dr Blix has strongly criticised the case made for war by Britain and the United States, based on Saddam Hussein’s supposed possession of illegal WMD.

However, in a Commons statement, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said that at the time the dossier was published, the assumption that Iraq did indeed have WMD was shared across the international community.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at news.scotsman.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blix; iraqdossier; ukdossier

1 posted on 10/13/2004 12:03:55 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Blix desperatly needs another gig but there isn't much demand for UN weapons inspectors nowadays.

Look at Scott Riter and Richard Butler.

2 posted on 10/13/2004 12:06:08 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Ach da ist der Nixy Blix!


3 posted on 10/13/2004 12:13:42 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Perhaps Blixy got a retirement donation courtesy of the U.N. oil-for-food program?


4 posted on 10/13/2004 12:19:41 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Proud "Pajama Militia" Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Blix is selling a book. Bashing Bush sells books. Hypocrisy be damned.


5 posted on 10/13/2004 12:23:52 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; Rise of South Park Republicans

Methinks Blix should pay a visit to Kim Jong.


6 posted on 10/13/2004 12:29:37 PM PDT by Clemenza (Still waiting in vain for a savior to rise from E Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Blix couldn't find his own posterior with both hands and a flashlight.


7 posted on 10/13/2004 12:43:48 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

I get so angered each time I've hear Democrats say on TV:
"Bush lied to the American People about Iraq's WMD!"

Yet, I've NEVER heard the one plausible response by
George Bush: "On the first day I entered the Oval Office in 2001, Mr.Clinton told me that he and Tony Blair had been advised by their respective Intelligentsia that Saddam Hussein had a stockpile of WMD. They had been dealing with the UN for years before my time; why should I question the validity of the situation?"

Every American school kid KNOWS that an incoming President is told all the highly classified info by the outgoing Administration! But then again, GWB isn't a whiner or
seeker of scapegoats!


8 posted on 10/13/2004 12:44:23 PM PDT by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Ol' Hans knows how to keep a job going, doesn't he?


9 posted on 10/13/2004 12:53:28 PM PDT by trentk (trentk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; All
Thanks for posting this. One area that is a little fuzzy to me now (in looking back) is what was the "state" of the inspection process.

I keep getting thrown the line that we had a "working" inspection process in place. And rather than invade Iraq, we should have continued the inspection process, and when necessary, simply administered "punishment" on an as-needed basis - rather than invasion as a whole.

A link to a detailed summation would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,
10 posted on 10/13/2004 2:34:01 PM PDT by jonno (We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

UN SCUM.


11 posted on 10/13/2004 5:15:41 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson