Posted on 10/13/2004 12:54:03 AM PDT by politicket
Edited on 10/13/2004 1:07:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Excerpt:
Mystery Surrounds Kerry's Navy Discharge
BY THOMAS LIPSCOMB - Special to the Sun
October 13, 2004
URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/3107
An official Navy document on Senator Kerry's campaign Web site listed as Mr. Kerry's "Honorable Discharge from the Reserves" opens a door on a well kept secret about his military service.
The document is a form cover letter in the name of the Carter administration's secretary of the Navy, W. Graham Claytor. It describes Mr. Kerry's discharge as being subsequent to the review of "a board of officers." This in it self is unusual. There is nothing about an ordinary honorable discharge action in the Navy that requires a review by a board of officers.
According to the secretary of the Navy's document, the "authority of reference" this board was using in considering Mr. Kerry's record was "Title 10, U.S. Code Section 1162 and 1163. "This section refers to the grounds for involuntary separation from the service. What was being reviewed, then, was Mr. Kerry's involuntary separation from the service. And it couldn't have been an honorable discharge, or there would have been no point in any review at all. The review was likely held to improve Mr. Kerry's status of discharge from a less than honorable discharge to an honorable discharge.
A Kerry campaign spokesman, David Wade, was asked whether Mr. Kerry had ever been a victim of an attempt to deny him an honorable discharge. There has been no response to that inquiry.
The document is dated February 16, 1978. But Mr. Kerry's military commitment began with his six-year enlistment contract with the Navy on February 18, 1966. His commitment should have terminated in 1972. It is highly unlikely that either the man who at that time was a Vietnam Veterans Against the War leader, John Kerry, requested or the Navy accepted an additional six year reserve commitment. And the Claytor document indicates proceedings to reverse a less than honorable discharge that took place sometime prior to February 1978.
The most routine time for Mr. Kerry's discharge would have been at the end of his six-year obligation, in 1972. But how was it most likely to have come about?
Funny how the Senatrix predicted this:
Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:36 p.m. EST
Hillary Predicts October Surprise
New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is predicting that this year's presidential election will be very tight and the victor will win because of "something unforeseen."
"It will be very close," the former first lady tells the New York Post's Cindy Adams.
On how the contest will ultimately be decided, Clinton said, "It will be outside forces - something unforeseen that suddenly happens - that tilts the election one way or the other."
In 1992, Clinton's husband won the White House after Reagan Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger was indicted on Iran-Contra charges four days before the vote. Though the indictment was later overturned, the charges were enough to reverse President Bush 41's last-minute surge in the polls to within one point of Clinton.
In 2000 - again four days before the vote - a Democrat operative in Maine uncovered court records from Bush 43's then-24-year-old DUI stop. Bush's 5-point lead in Florida dwindled to a mere 537 votes, with the DUI news making Gore the popular vote winner nationwide.
I agree 100% that sKerry should release his records like he said he would on Meet the Press and along with his surrogates has claimed he has 100 times since.
These are things worth looking into. I have. But as much as I despise sKerry, without facts, anything else is speculation [like claims by Bush haters that AFR forms meant he had been transferred to a disciplinary unit in Colorado - ANG by law is part of Air Force Reserve [AFR], AFR forms are the norm].
The second this was reported in the NYSun, it became Old News...
And, I still submit that all the people saying Kerry "served his country honorably" are full of crap.
>>> eFing's discharge is here: http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Honorable_Discharge_From_Reserve.pdf <<<<
The document above is not Kerry's Honorable Discharge certificate. If you read through this document you will note that the Honorable Discharge certificate under #3 was enclosed with this transmittal document.
I don't know whether or not Kerry has scanned the actual Honorable Discharge certificate on his website but if it is there it would be a more "fancy" looking form something like a high school diploma looks.
There's only one woman in the world smart enough to get this information into the right hands at the right time and she isn't Craig Livingstone.
What about Kerry's FBI file? Possibly something about a dishonorable discharge might be there? Aren't those files available via the FOIA?
And then again, Pigs will fly before the MSM asks him this question!
bookmarked
This smells to high Heaven....Will anyone have the balls to run with this story......
>> Kerry has not released lots of stuff:
He has not released his war documents
He has not released divorce documents
His wife has not released her financial records <<
He has not released his medical records. He had cancer a year or two ago.
IMHO, if there is an October surprise from Hillary and the Clinton machine - the most logical would be to keep Kerry out of the White House so she can run in 2008.
Senator, what day in the next 20 are you going to sign the SF-180, thereby putting to rest the debate about the status of your discharge? Senator, here is a calendar and a pen so you can pick the date. Better yet I have an SF-180 right here for you, now sign on the dotted line and we will clear this up.
http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Honorable_Discharge_From_Reserve.pdf
Note that the actual certificate would have been enclosed with this letter, but probably was not forwarded to BUPERS for microfiching. Nonetheless, the document above, presuming it is genuine, is his honorable discharge from the Naval Reserve.
and he wins the nobel peace prize... Liberal joke.
Carter pardoned everyone didn't he?
#50- sounds right on the money
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.