To: Bronzewound
Oddly enough, I know what they're talking about. There was a thread posted here a couple of days ago. It appears the that this Navy Chief has some inside information about Kerry's discharge being not honorable and was looking for more documents to corroborate his story. Others on that forum say he's reliable. I don't know one way or the other but it sure looks like a bombshell if true.
44 posted on
10/12/2004 10:32:32 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("I hate going to places like Austin and Dubuque to raise large sums of money. But I have to," Kerry)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Oddly enough, I know what they're talking about.Thank you. Hope it's not a disappointment as these things can often be.
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
This sounds interesting. Here is what the NavyChief teased about his info:
Let me give you a little taste of what is to come:
Today, President Carter is getting a phonecall.
Special Assistant to President Nixon, Chuck Colson is getting a phonecall.
Secretary of the Navy under President Nixon and Senator John Warner is getting a phonecall.
Secretary of the Navy under President Carter, W. Graham Clayton is getting a phonecall.
Commander, Naval Personnel Command, RADM David Harlow under Carter is getting a phonecall.
Once this sucker breaks -- watch out! <
So, as you can see -- this little ole retired Navy Chief is in need of someone that can help me give a certain agency a little push to cooperate.
- Chief
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1236864/posts
it's on that thread, but SVT took the link off his original post, they said they won't let a rumour be posted, but I guess it's no rumour anymore
59 posted on
10/12/2004 10:38:55 PM PDT by
hipaatwo
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
There was a thread posted here a couple of days ago. It appears the that this Navy Chief has some inside information about Kerry's discharge being not honorable and was looking for more documents to corroborate his story. Others on that forum say he's reliable
......
I've figured all along that he HAD to have had a dishonorable " or "less than honorable" - not only because he deserved it, but because the 'honorable " one didn't come thru until 1978! -by that time, his surrogate daddy in senate (Teddy) could've fixed it for him (they do do that)
NOW the question is - if it were dishonorable and reason was - "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" and the Constitution disqualifies anyone (who was an officer and had take the oath of allegiance to the US) with such a label from EVER running for public office, even Senator,let alone Pres (heck, he couldn't run for dog catcher in my little town) I hate to say it, never thought I would wish anyone ill, but I will find great pleasure in seeing this happen. If it does, it's only just rewards for him to be taken down on the exact point he's been lying about Bush on all this time. That would be a great example to all children from henceforth: What you do unto others will be done to you - so you better make it something good! (just a little scarry thought - if he's ousted - who jumps into the breech? Madame C? = Maybe she leaked it in the first place? Maybe she'd had the records since her white house days - she certainly had a penchant for illegally gathering personal files on people. And she doesn't like long campaigns 'cause she can't hold her nasty side in long enough to get through one. H,mmm. now a little of my glee is gone. this could be really good,or really bad. Mybe nothing can be offically decided until after the elections - so...? Yep, I'm loosing it
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
If it's true that his discharge was not honorable - Hillary MUST HAVE KNOWN. With her access to the FBI files she probably has a lot of ammunition and is just waiting to use it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson