Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
There was a thread posted here a couple of days ago. It appears the that this Navy Chief has some inside information about Kerry's discharge being not honorable and was looking for more documents to corroborate his story. Others on that forum say he's reliable
......
I've figured all along that he HAD to have had a dishonorable " or "less than honorable" - not only because he deserved it, but because the 'honorable " one didn't come thru until 1978! -by that time, his surrogate daddy in senate (Teddy) could've fixed it for him (they do do that)
NOW the question is - if it were dishonorable and reason was - "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" and the Constitution disqualifies anyone (who was an officer and had take the oath of allegiance to the US) with such a label from EVER running for public office, even Senator,let alone Pres (heck, he couldn't run for dog catcher in my little town) I hate to say it, never thought I would wish anyone ill, but I will find great pleasure in seeing this happen. If it does, it's only just rewards for him to be taken down on the exact point he's been lying about Bush on all this time. That would be a great example to all children from henceforth: What you do unto others will be done to you - so you better make it something good! (just a little scarry thought - if he's ousted - who jumps into the breech? Madame C? = Maybe she leaked it in the first place? Maybe she'd had the records since her white house days - she certainly had a penchant for illegally gathering personal files on people. And she doesn't like long campaigns 'cause she can't hold her nasty side in long enough to get through one. H,mmm. now a little of my glee is gone. this could be really good,or really bad. Mybe nothing can be offically decided until after the elections - so...? Yep, I'm loosing it
175 posted on 10/12/2004 11:30:30 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7
NOW the question is - if it were dishonorable and reason was - "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" and the Constitution disqualifies anyone (who was an officer and had take the oath of allegiance to the US) with such a label from EVER running for public office, even Senator,let alone Pres (heck, he couldn't run for dog catcher in my little town)

Might explain the melt down the Dem Talking heads like Susan Estrich have whenever the SBV topic comes up

607 posted on 10/13/2004 7:08:11 AM PDT by Mo1 (The President's job is not to pass a global test, but to protect the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson