The timings he elevated it that is not it is committing, but if the operations Lmnfthoa became possible, the choice they chose the times that it elevated. But why ؟؟؟؟
* a choice took place on Tuesday optimism about a Battle of Badr, has happened on Tuesday, the choice of Althathaa day takes place if it was the land the intended is the execution of its works by it a land not its Islamist ( any in the countries others is its Islamist ) Also, one of its request informed me the knowledge that Allah created the evil on Tuesday. (Its optimum: the battles of Manhattan and New York, Madrid, tattered) *
a choice takes place on Friday for the execution of the operations in the Islamic countries, with the coincidence with he prayed it Friday, in order not to it is injured Muslims in the attack, then the Muslim should be in the mosque at this time, and who it was injured from the Muslims then no Ylomn is except himself . (Its optimum: Kenya explosions and Dar Es Salaam) *
the choice of the morning takes place in most times in order not to she misses executor\ the executors that its letter prayed.
Then the time between the call to prayer of the dawn is to the call to prayer of the noon a wide, and in order not to the attacker and he is a debtor is martyred with the prayer of its letter. (its optimum : all Al-Qaeda operations except Bali attacks and Taba )
I find it odd that the 'chatter' level has been virtually non-existent since the two AQ tapes from last week.
Normally, these guys are going full-tilt, 24x7, threatening us with anything they can think to put up on a Web page (usually our total annhiliation, and other hyperbole).
So what happens? The big kahuna (Usama) puts out a tape that's totally out of character for him (playing statesman vs. someone making more hyperbolic threats), and everything goes "radio silent".
SOMETHING Ain't Right about this, gang.
I remember hearing how pre-9/11 that the same thing happened..terrorist chatter went to virtually nil in the weeks leading up to 9/11.
And then we hear many 'experts' this weekend on FNC, etc saying that they "don't think the tapes imply a prelude to an attack".
I dunno about this. It doesn't seem "in character" for AQ, despite Usama's desire to apparently impact the election and get the considerably weaker (on defense) "Breck girl" team into the WH.
Anyone else get the feeling that something isn't quite kosher here? It just doesn't seem to...fit.
Comments/ideas? Just wondering what everyone else thinks and if any of you guys have picked up on the same here.