Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmstein7
Not being a master debater, perhaps I should keep quiet. However, I do believe Bush only needs to say one thing at the beginning of the debate that will disable all of the Kerry responses.

All Bush has to do is warn anyone watching the debate to watch out for the word "but" coming from Kerry. Kerry says one thing and always says "but" when changing the subject or justifying his opposite viewpoint.

Once Bush says to watch for the word "but" Kerry will be thrown off his stride because he cannot answer questions without using the modifier to adjust (read change) his position.

17 posted on 10/12/2004 7:32:20 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Morgan in Denver

"All Bush has to do is warn anyone watching the debate to watch out for the word "but" coming from Kerry"

I like it and I think you are correct. I was thinking something similar. Like at the beginning challenging sKerry to answer all questions by first pointing out the success or experience that makes him qualified. Then Bush could state flatly that he won't be able to do it. I'd love to see sKerry's reaction.


50 posted on 10/12/2004 7:45:55 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver
Excellent point. About half way through every response, Kerry says "but" and starts saying the opposite of the beginning of his response. This is not a new flaw in Kerry's debating style.

He was offering involved and self-contradictory statements in debates in 1963. That's when I debated against his Liberal Party at Yale in the Political Union, and beat them. LOL.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "America Fails the 'Global Test' "

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

61 posted on 10/12/2004 7:53:42 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver
Doh, I should have read further before I posted. You listened to Rush yesterday also, huh?

Sorry.

67 posted on 10/12/2004 7:58:06 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver

I didn't read all the posts before I put my two cents in--BUT you and I have the same idea. We almost wrote the same words about how it would affect Kerry's response.

This would be so simple for Bush to use as an attack mode. The publich would start listening for Kerry's BUTS and it would help beat his butt.

I don't want to sound egotistical but somehow we need to get this brought to the attention of Rove, etc.


87 posted on 10/12/2004 8:13:17 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver

Excellent point. Don't let Kerry get away with using the word "but". Focus on the decisions that Kerry has had to make other than marrying rich, he really hasn't been held accountable for anything he has done. Look for Bush to focus on bills with Kerry's name and lazy record of not doing anything or showing up when expected. That would put him back on his heels.


105 posted on 10/12/2004 8:29:51 AM PDT by kevinm13 (4 More Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver
Once Bush says to watch for the word "but" Kerry will be thrown off his stride because he cannot answer questions without using the modifier to adjust (read change) his position.

BINGO!

107 posted on 10/12/2004 8:31:40 AM PDT by jslade (People who are easily offended......OFFEND ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver

I have used this tactic in debating my wife's doc ( he was on three sides of every two sided issue).


147 posted on 10/12/2004 9:01:13 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver
"All Bush has to do is warn anyone watching the debate to watch out for the word "but" coming from Kerry. Kerry says one thing and always says "but" when changing the subject or justifying his opposite viewpoint."

Well said Morgan. I think you boiled down the whole article to this one sentence. Excellent.

154 posted on 10/12/2004 9:10:19 AM PDT by subterfuge (Union THuGs: they're all the RAGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver

Here's a beginning response for Bush. "Tonight my opponent will say that he "has a plan". But he doesn't. Tonight my opponent will be negative and attack me no matter what question is asked." Soemthing to that effect would work.


178 posted on 10/12/2004 9:57:52 AM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver; Congressman Billybob
All Bush has to do is warn anyone watching the debate to watch out for the word "but" coming from Kerry.

I've heard the word "but" referred to as "The Great Canceller." Linguistically, it ususally cancels out EVERYTHING that came before it, the subconcious effect is to say "forget all that, here's the real point."

We've all seen it: "You're doing a really great job, but...", "That's a really good point, but...".

Once someone pointed the phenomenon out to me years ago, it's like a red light flashing every time "but" pops up! If Bush could point it out clearly and with good humor, it would totally change every person's experience of listening to Kerry, because he does it constantly. Once you're conscious of it, it's very hard to miss.

202 posted on 10/12/2004 2:49:18 PM PDT by TheSarce (FreeRepublic: The Mother of All Fact-Checkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson