Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chieftain

Good point about the Pandora's box. I agree that's a tricky one.

I still however, do not think we ned an anti-gay marriage amendment.That's way too much government interference in our bedrooms. Leave it state to state. and lets see where all this goes.


14 posted on 10/11/2004 8:01:22 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Buying more ice cream bars each day to keep up with this election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering Ex-hippie
I still however, do not think we ned an anti-gay marriage amendment.That's way too much government interference in our bedrooms. Leave it state to state.

If there are no ACTIVIST judges legislating from the bench, you don't.

The people of Mass. voted and overwhelmingly voted for no gay marriage, the Mass. Supremes over-rode them 4-3 and the openly lesbian judge was against gay marriage!

15 posted on 10/11/2004 8:16:42 PM PDT by Chieftain (Support Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and EXPOSE Hanoi John Kerry's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

It's not an anti-gay marriage amendment, it's a pro traditional marriage amendment.
It's also the Only marriage God intended.


17 posted on 10/11/2004 8:27:28 PM PDT by jan in Colorado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson