Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah; misty; All
On the McCain/Feingold campaign finance reform, wasn't the bill brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, but McCain asked them to put it aside before ruling on its constitutionality - till after the 2004 election?

As I recall, one of the main points of this bill was to keep candidates' ads off of t.v./radio 60 days before the election. Right?

If so, isn't that a violation of the 1st Amendment - won't such a law tend to prevent minor parties from voicing their opinions? As it is, we haven't heard anything in Arizona on any other 3rd party than Nader and the Greens.

173 posted on 10/11/2004 8:59:22 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: lakey
As I recall, one of the main points of this bill was to keep candidates' ads off of t.v./radio 60 days before the election. Right?

Wrong.

175 posted on 10/11/2004 9:01:44 PM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: lakey
On the McCain/Feingold campaign finance reform, wasn't the bill brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, but McCain asked them to put it aside before ruling on its constitutionality - till after the 2004 election?

No.

As I recall, one of the main points of this bill was to keep candidates' ads off of t.v./radio 60 days before the election. Right?

Only if you're accepting federal matching funds. Which the Libertarians are not eligible for, anyway.

260 posted on 10/12/2004 3:31:55 AM PDT by Poohbah (SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER...SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson