Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey
I thought their philosophy was "no-harm, no-foul". Where am I wrong?

I can recommend some books about different political philosophies if you like.

You really should read up before you start spouting nonsense. It makes you look silly and kills any chance of credibility for your arguments.

105 posted on 10/11/2004 6:34:13 PM PDT by Protagoras (When your circus has a big tent, you can fit a lot of clowns inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras
I can recommend some books about different political philosophies if you like. You really should read up before you start spouting nonsense. It makes you look silly and kills any chance of credibility for your arguments.

Just tell me which one you think it is:

A) It is LP philosophy to only sue AFTER harm is done, or
B) It is LP philosophy to be able to sue someone before they harm you.

Simple. Select one.

I claim it is A but you don't want to select either. Why not?

107 posted on 10/11/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Protagoras

I would have thought you a libertarian.
Would it be possible to ask if you have a label that you consider appropriate for you political philosophy?


109 posted on 10/11/2004 6:40:01 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson