Posted on 10/11/2004 9:36:56 AM PDT by LibWhacker
The New York Times Magazine ran an 8,300 word piece on Senator John Kerry on Sunday titled “Kerry’s Undeclared War.” But as one plowed through the fluff piece it became apparent that John Kerry is not even convinced that America is at war. In fact when John Kerry was asked “"what it would take for Americans to feel safe again," he answered with an analogy comparing combating terrorism to fighting prostitution and illegal gambling.
I’m not making this up.
[ . . . ]
Senator John Kerry has ratcheted up the rhetoric of late, but it is very apparent that he believes in pre 9/11 type thinking. Al Qaeda declared war on America long before 9/11 and the American government ignored it then, trying to fight it in the courts under the Clinton Administration. John Kerry agreed with that approach and now if elected, all rhetoric aside, has shown his true colors and has declared that he would hold summits, make speeches at the United Nations and treat terrorism as a crime, not as a war.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtondispatch.com ...
Petition congress to ask for Senator Kerry's withdraw as a candidate because of his lack of understanding the threat that 3000 American Civilians died to teach him... Talk about being beyond ignorant.. Terezzzaaa may have gotten away with this but the candidate...
John Kerry is the most dangerous man to ever run for the White House. The fact that he is even being considered for the office boggles the mind. The bottom line is that we will be less safe under a Kerry administration. In fact, if we were to be attacked, Kerry would only respond if he got the OK to do so from a focus group.
When I got that in my email yesterday, I couldn't believe what I was reading. Terrorist are a nuisance? Before I posted it from BC'04, I read it twice to make sure what I was reading. Despicable if you ask me and points to the fact that John Kerry is not fit to lead this Country.
Where is the MSM? Asleep at their desks again because it is John Kerry saying these words?
The more liberals speak, the deeper they sink
Maybe it's not the photogs, maybe it's just the Camera itself that hates him. The guy is tall, he's not hideous, but somehow every single photo of him screams out GOOFBALL! Now Bush can look pretty goofy at times, but he can also look fabbo. Kerry looks idiotic in every shot. I'm amazed at this. Unless news photogs are some secret right-wing conspiracy within the MSM.
Why did you post a picture of Stan Laurel on this thread? :)
Kerry may or may not have been taken out of context to one extent or another. What bothers me is, what has for long bothered me about Kerry is, he has once again said where we need to go, where he will supposedly take us, he spends very little time saying exactly HOW he will take us there.
Takes one to know one.....
You know what I mean....
What a goober......
If the Kerry campaign were really with it, they would spend as much time trying to hide Kerry from the press as they do his sugarwife. His poll numbers go up when he's not seen and heard and fall when he gets out in public.
It's a nuisance to have to put up Lurch's insufferable ignorance. Is the definition of "nuance" now idiocy? Let's change the dictionary so we can all avoid it in future.
John Kerry. What a fool.
HAH! If Terrorists blow up the "Scaramouche", THAT incident alone will start WWIII.
I'm shocked......Let me know if they mention MoveOn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.