Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather - Michael Moore, Same Source? Too good to be true
Newsmax.com ^ | 10/11/04 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/11/2004 8:31:37 AM PDT by lward99

Alan Skorski is a hero, cant wait to read his Franken book...This is too good to be true.

Monday, Oct. 11, 2004 9:57 a.m. EDT Dan Rather: CBS's Michael Moore

Could it be that "CBS Evening News" anchorman Dan Rather has lower journalistic standards than even Michael Moore, whose conspiracy film "Fahrenheit 9/11" may be a model piece of political propaganda, but doesn't come close to qualifying as "journalism"?

Last week the web site Ratherbiased.com quote Moore saying he rejected the same forged military records Rather used in his disastrous Sept. 8 broadcast to trash President Bush.

"Back when I was making Fahrenheit, I was offered the same documents that were given to CBS but I didn't use them because we couldn't verify them," Moore said following a speech at the University of Central Arkansas. The radical filmmaker said he also rejected other scoops that sounded "too good to be true," like the story from a woman who claimed she had dinner with Bush and the family of Osama bin Laden.

According to Alan Skorski, a former congressional candidate who's writing a book about Al Franken, Rather and Moore have something in common - a London-based reporter named Greg Palast.

In fact, Palast has claimed credit for reports broken by both Moore and Rather over the years.

In a recent screed he titled, "The Lynching of Dan Rather," Palast wrote, "Dan is in hot water for a report my own investigative team put in Britain's Guardian papers and on BBC TV years ago" - referring to the story that Bush got favorable treatment in the National Guard.

On the eve of the 2000 election, Palast interviewed Bill Burkett, the former National Guard officer who would later pass bogus Guard records to Rather's news team. Burkett talked about Bush's records being scrubbed, but at the time had no documents to back the claim up.

The expatriate journalist says he's also been feeding movie-maker Moore info on Bush for years. This past May Palast wrote:

"In fact, our joke in the London newsroom is that if we can't get our story on to American airwaves, we can just slip it to the fat guy in the chicken suit. Moore could sneak it past the censors as 'entertainment.'"

Palast says Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a direct rip-off of his material, claiming in the same report:

"I know, because, with my investigative team at BBC television and The Guardian of Britain, I wrote and filmed the original reports on which Moore's new documentary are based."

Could it be that Rather and Moore actually share the same sources? Not exactly. At least Moore deserves credit for not getting conned by Bill Burkett's phony documents.

Maybe when Rather retires, CBS should replace him with the more discerning "fat guy in the chicken suit."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alanskorski; danrather; danscam; gregpalast; lurch; michaelmoore; moore; napalminthemorning; newsmax; rather; rathergate; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Zebra

Reading some of the replies, I think many of you are missing the point. This is not about Moore rejecting material that can't be verified, it's about a link between Rather and Greg palast, who btw has also taken credit for providing Moore the garbage for his movie.


21 posted on 10/11/2004 12:28:02 PM PDT by nialju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lward99
"Back when I was making Fahrenheit, I was offered the same documents that were given to CBS but I didn't use them because we couldn't verify them," Moore said.

Even propagandists have standards.

22 posted on 10/11/2004 12:32:42 PM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zebra

I agree, no way Moore turned down those docs. He never cared about supporting his positions with facts, why should he start now?


23 posted on 10/11/2004 12:33:25 PM PDT by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tjg

I think Moore is a a twin of Bill Maher. Thats why hes so bad looking.


24 posted on 10/11/2004 6:23:32 PM PDT by CouncilofTrent (Quo Primum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson