Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear factor -- It's time to turn Fox News loose in Canada's liberal hen-house
Calgary Sun ^ | October 10, 2004 | Paul Jackson

Posted on 10/11/2004 4:57:06 AM PDT by Clive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2004 4:57:07 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...

-


2 posted on 10/11/2004 4:57:27 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

It's interesting that they don't have freedom of speech in Canada.


3 posted on 10/11/2004 5:00:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Communism has taken deep root in Canada, it has invaded America and IT truely is the war we face today.


4 posted on 10/11/2004 5:03:03 AM PDT by FesterUSMC ("If you don't have the hammer, you are going to be the anvil, and I would rather have the hammer!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Communism has taken deep root in Canada, it has invaded America and IT truely is the war we face today.


5 posted on 10/11/2004 5:03:04 AM PDT by FesterUSMC ("If you don't have the hammer, you are going to be the anvil, and I would rather have the hammer!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Hence, allowing Fox News to beam its common-sense philosophies into our nation has to be halted, or, delayed as long as possible.

Canadian broadcast laws require 50 percent canadian content on every channel so Fox can't be broadcasted. American cable channels can't be broadcasted. The Canadian population is held hostage and doesn't know the extent of the censorship they are enduring.

6 posted on 10/11/2004 5:04:10 AM PDT by i.l.e. (is lurking enough -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: i.l.e.

Violates NAFTA.


7 posted on 10/11/2004 5:07:53 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i.l.e.

Just have Fox include re-runs of Bob & Doug McKenzie's Great White North every half hour.

"Take off!" "No, you take off!"


8 posted on 10/11/2004 5:09:21 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i.l.e.
Canadian broadcast laws require 50 percent canadian content on every channel so Fox can't be broadcasted. American cable channels can't be broadcasted.

Canadians already get CNN and AJ. Cable channels do not broadcast, they are a closed feed, and perhaps may not be forced to meet the same requirements as network broadcasts.

I am not sure how Canadian law differentiates, but I do know that the FCC has different sets of guidelines for both.

9 posted on 10/11/2004 5:15:11 AM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

It's a violation of both GATT and NAFTA for the Canadian government to discriminate against American companies. The US should take them in front of the WTO.


10 posted on 10/11/2004 5:22:00 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Fox News ... bring it on!


11 posted on 10/11/2004 5:35:04 AM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

..."Since Fox regularly beats CNN in the ratings, you can guess what it will do to the CBC, already hardly watched by anyone except its fawning Lib-Left adherents."

The "fawning Lib-Left adherents" amount to about 80% of the population of Canuckistan. We've seen what the Canucks are made of, considering the manner in which they re-elected the Liberals and Martin, regardless of having common knowledge of this party's scandals and cowardice. Watching Fox News wouldn't have given them any more information then they already had. Broadcasting Fox News there won't matter a whit. Canucks are irredeemable.

God Save Australia!

F**k Canuckistan!


12 posted on 10/11/2004 5:50:09 AM PDT by bowzer313
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
"Fox News ... bring it on!"

Agreed.

I put in my support for Fox's application through the CRTC website.

13 posted on 10/11/2004 5:51:09 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: i.l.e.
CRTC has licensed cable and sattelite companies to run PBS, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CNN and CNN Headline News.

Where a US network and a Canadian one are running the same program at the same time, the cable company must take its feed from the Canadian network.

Al Jazeera is allowed to run but the cable companies have to have a time-delay and monitor it to remove abusive content, a condition which has never before been attached to a licence. This condition would make the Canadian cable carrier responsible and liable for Al Jazeera's content. As a result, the Canadian cable companies are refusing to run Al Jazeera.

Canadian content rules apply to Canadian stations and networks, not to US stations or networks.

14 posted on 10/11/2004 5:51:21 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clive

FoxNews will bring down the Liberal government in Canada.

BRING IT ON!


15 posted on 10/11/2004 5:54:03 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (Kerry's entire campaign depends on calling Bush a liar - ABC's Halperin is a slimeball.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Canadians can get FoxNews now by fudging a bit.

Buy a DTV satellite dish in the U.S., register the receiver from a U.S. address and set up a direct pay account from a bank. The dish will work anywhere near the U.S. (with a view of the southern sky) - which is 95% of Canada by population. It might even work in Edmonton.

There are probably laws against this but I doubt they are enforced. And the initial outlay is minimal since DTV is running promotions. Plus you get loads more channels.

16 posted on 10/11/2004 6:18:56 AM PDT by RossA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Violates NAFTA.

No, there is a specific exemption in NAFTA for Canadian culture. It is also illegal for an American to run a bookstore or book distribution company in Canada as well (probably not enforced, but on the books).

17 posted on 10/11/2004 6:28:13 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Sounds like Nafta is a one way street. How about GATT? Does it violate GATT?


18 posted on 10/11/2004 6:37:27 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clive
I don't know what the liberals in Canada are scared of? Fox News has started a "port side list" for some time now. I pick and choose what I watch on Fox due to what I consider a blatant effort to try and pander to the liberals in this country. Maybe they are doing it to get into the Canadian market (right!).
19 posted on 10/11/2004 6:42:30 AM PDT by lt.america (Captain was already taken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bowzer313

Man, you sound really tough!

Are you aware that Americans re-elected Bill Clinton?

Even slightly aware?


20 posted on 10/11/2004 8:53:58 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson