Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards Disputes Rice on Iraq Invasion
Reuters ^ | 10/10/04 | Lori Santos

Posted on 10/10/2004 12:17:57 PM PDT by wagglebee

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards on Sunday disputed a White House assertion that it was right to topple Saddam Hussein even if he had no illegal weapons because he posed a future threat.

The North Carolina senator, appearing on several television news programs, said Saddam's intention to eventually gather weapons of mass destruction was one of dozens of such threats.

"There are lots of threats waiting to happen all over the world," Edwards said. "That doesn't mean that that justifies invading a country."

Edwards was responding to U.S. national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, who told "Fox News Sunday" that President Bush was "absolutely" correct to have launched the invasion of Iraq even if they had known, as they do now, that the former Iraqi president had no stockpiles of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

Saddam was "a major and growing threat to the international community" with "an insatiable appetite for weapons of mass destruction," Rice said.

"It was time to take care of him. And this president, post-September 11th, was not going to let threats continue to gather," she added. "It was only a matter of time."

The two continued a debate that has dominated the U.S. presidential campaign in recent weeks and intensified with the final report of chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, who concluded Iraq had no unconventional weapons -- a main rationale for going to war.

"You know, the Bush administration's explanation is: 'We invaded a country because at some point in the future they might get weapons of mass destruction?' ... I mean, the bottom line is, this is a convoluted logic to try to justify in hindsight what we now know wasn't true," Edwards said on CNN's "Late Edition."

Bush says his Democratic rival, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, agreed in the spring of 2003 it was the right decision to invade Iraq but now says it was the wrong war. Kerry has said repeatedly that Bush rushed to war without a strong coalition or a plan to win the peace.

"We did not authorize this president to make the mess that he has now made in Iraq," Edwards said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

The first-term senator also noted that of the three countries singled out by Bush as part of an "axis of evil" -- Iraq, North Korea and Iran -- "you know, we invaded the one of those three that doesn't have nuclear weapons."

Edwards predicted the situation in Iraq, where a violent insurgency has raged for more than a year after Saddam was ousted, "and whether the president's going to level with people about that ... will drive the decision on November 2nd."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; edwards; flipflops; iraq; kerry; rice; saddam; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
The Breck Girl and sKerry both voted for it and they had the same information that Bush had. sKerry said that he would do the same thing if it had to be done again.
When are these idiots going to pick a story and stick to it?!
1 posted on 10/10/2004 12:17:57 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wish Rice could do more campaigning...

She's so impressive.


2 posted on 10/10/2004 12:20:05 PM PDT by TFine80 (DK'S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Waffling LIARS...ANYTHING TO GET INTO THE WHITE HOUSE...ANYTHING.


3 posted on 10/10/2004 12:20:38 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1240901/posts

Edwards comments on Hardball 10/13/03
Little Green Footballs ^




4 posted on 10/10/2004 12:22:31 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I'd like to see Condi and Silk pony toe to toe.

Condi would take him apart


5 posted on 10/10/2004 12:23:13 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions~$1.00 Todays Special: Halfbaked~50. cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TFine80

I think its very possible that Rice may run for Prez in 2008. Imagine Rice running against "Ruler of the World" wannabe Hillary Clinton..



http://hometown.aol.com/joevberry333/


6 posted on 10/10/2004 12:23:52 PM PDT by joevberry333 (http://hometown.aol.com/joevberry333/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Edwards, you're a candy-ass wimp who knows nothing
of international politics. All you know is how to sue
doctors and drive them out of business. I hope we will
have heard the last of you on Nov. 3, when you can just
go back to being AWOL from the Senate.


7 posted on 10/10/2004 12:24:15 PM PDT by beethovenfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Edwards said that Saddam was the most serious and imminent of all threats the US faced! Does his flip-flop appear in this article? Of course not.


8 posted on 10/10/2004 12:24:59 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Bosnia, Bosnia....darn, I know I've heard of that country from somewhere.


9 posted on 10/10/2004 12:26:38 PM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Edwards/Kerry would have prefered we wait,
until ALL three Axis of evils had the bomb!


10 posted on 10/10/2004 12:27:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Too bad we don't have any journalist left in America. Why didn't just ONE of them say

"Well why did you and Senator Kerry vote for the Authorization then?" "Was the coalition that we had in the 1st Gulf war a "Strong Coalition" Senator. "So why is a 31 Nation Coalition not strong yet a 34 nation one was strong Senator? Every time Kerry/Edwards open their mouths they show us why they are unfit for ANY office, much less the White House. A Kerry/Edwards administration would not be just BAD for American, it would be decidedly DANGEROUS for America
11 posted on 10/10/2004 12:28:08 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

John Edwards--isn't he that psychic guy on TV?


12 posted on 10/10/2004 12:29:00 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; MEG33; mylife; EagleUSA; wagglebee; tet68; MNJohnnie
Edwards on CNN 2/24/02: "Iraq and Saddam Hussein present the most serious and most imminent threat."
CNN ^

Posted on 07/09/2004 12:37:23 AM EDT by adam_az

Edwards urged military action on Iraq instead of North Korea with John King, who was subbing for Wolf Blitzer.......



KING: Senator Edwards, when discussing the North Korean problem, the president wants to confront the regime, deal with its own missiles program plus its exports. There is not a reasonable military option when it comes to North Korea is there?

EDWARDS: Well, I don't think we're focused on military options right now, John.

I think it was important, in answer to your last question, it was important for the president to go to the region. I think he did help alleviate some of the concerns that people in that area had about this "axis of evil" comment.

But I do think that the more serious question going forward is, what are we going to do? I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries. I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country.

And I think they -- as a result, we have to, as we go forward and as we develop policies about how we're going to deal with each of these countries and what action, if any, we're going to take with respect to them, I think each of them have to be dealt with on their own merits.

And they do, in my judgment, present different threats. And I think Iraq and Saddam Hussein present the most serious and most imminent threat.

13 posted on 10/10/2004 12:30:31 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"There are lots of threats waiting to happen all over the world," Edwards said. "That doesn't mean that that justifies invading a country."

How many "UN" resolutions, over how many years, were there that only got as far as Saddams middle finger?

How many inspectors were booted out of Iraq?

How many missiles fired upon US aircraft, monitoring the NO FLY ZONE over how many years?

Stand back UN boys it's time for the "MEN" to resolve this situation!

Watch how it's done and learn!

14 posted on 10/10/2004 12:31:16 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This should be corrected:
It aired February 24, 2002
15 posted on 10/10/2004 12:32:57 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That's what it says...


16 posted on 10/10/2004 12:34:23 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Condi was awesome today on Fox Sunday. Hadn't seen her in awhile. She's always impressive and was again today.


17 posted on 10/10/2004 12:35:01 PM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; Howlin
I must be losing my mind, I could have sworn it said 2004.
Sorry :)
18 posted on 10/10/2004 12:36:09 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I saw Johnny Boy on Fox News Sunday today, he was on defense most of the time and looked more like 'deer in the headlights' than I can ever recall seeing Quayle.

Certainly out of his league.

Way over his head.


19 posted on 10/10/2004 12:36:40 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It happens. :-)


20 posted on 10/10/2004 12:40:57 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson