My uncle was a ThD graduate there a couple of years back (he pastors in a Canadian-Chinese Baptist Church in Whitby, Ontario, Canada now) so I know where the direction it is going.
I think you were there in the early years it started on the slippery slope - it was in 1972 when they publicly renounced Scriptural inerrency. It doen't need another 3 or 4 decades before it is no different from the Princeton Theological Seminary, although it may retain a couple of true Christians (Bruce Metzger is one example).
I was going off second-hand impression, not direct experience. I live in Southern California and in the early eighties I had people I respected who respected Fuller. With that as my 'expert testimony,' I had no reason to question it nor did I take the time to deeply investigate Fuller's views as I really had no cause.
Denying scriptural inerrancy per the Chicago Statement is detrimental, so you gave me all the evidence I need to move from a positive opinion to a "concerned" opinion.
Thanks.