The issue of health of the mother can be fixed by performing a C-Section..I had 2 and my DIL had to have one with our grandson. Does no one ever think that a C-Section should be the prefered way to save the life of the mom AND the baby?
Not if you do not value life as a first priority. This is exactly the Problem with the liberal argument for abortion .. .It holds no value of life... same with stem cells... same with cloning... A society that places no value on life will always fail... Any politician that will sell out his religious beliefs, his faith, his very soul for political gain is purly evil... Kerry stood on that stage tonight and said I am a Catholic... but he is on the wrong side of all Catholic values... He goes against the teachings of the church... He could be a politician and still hold true to his beliefs... his core... his values... his church... but no he wants more votes so he goes pro-Abortion it is simply reprehensible and explains his lack of character very well...
When the PBA issue first arose, a group of OB-GYNs took out a full-page in the WSJ (and probably other places) saying that a PBA is never necessary to the life or health of the mother.
The problem not fixed by a C-section is that then you have a live baby and killing it would be murder under the law (so far, anyway).
You are so absolutely right about that. Would be nice for a few pro-life politicians to grasp that in response to some of these abortion questions.
No, probably because the goal of the pro-death movement is not to save lives at all.
Carolyn
Yeah, but the problem for Kerry and his ilk is that with a C-Section, the result is a LIVE baby! That's not what those folks want!
Yes, but John Edwards will ensure as Vice-President that there are no more practicing OB-GYNS to perform those life-saving deliveries.