Posted on 10/08/2004 1:55:25 PM PDT by MaineRepublic
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. presidential campaign between George W. Bush and John Kerry (news - web sites) has prompted a frenzy of gossip and conspiracy theories among Internet bloggers, hybrid online sites that blend news, gossip and opinion.
As Bush and the Massachusetts Senator slug it out in a neck-and-neck race ahead of the November 2 election, partisan bloggers have flooded the Internet with alternative views about both candidates, which they hope will help sway voters.
Experts say much of the gossip on the Internet is as loony as supermarket tabloid stories claiming Elvis Presley lives, but that it still has a role to play in the campaign.
"Blogs probably pretty accurately reflect the level of polarization and paranoia and frustration among everyday Americans that the entire campaign reflects," said Vanity Fair media critic Michael Wolff, characterizing the new form of overtly-biased journalism as "the voice of the mob."
After Tuesday's debate between Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) and Kerry's running mate Sen. John Edwards (news - web sites), blogs quickly refuted Cheney's claim that he never met Edwards, posting a picture of the two together within moments of his statement.
And ahead of Friday's second debate between Bush and Kerry, the Internet was abuzz with gossip that the president wore a listening device during last week's debate allowing an unseen puppet master to whisper cues and tips in his ear.
The Bush campaign said that rumor -- likening the president to Milli Vanilli, the infamous singing duet unveiled as frauds for lip-syncing -- was totally false.
"It's a laughable, left-wing conspiracy theory," said Bush campaign spokesman Scott Stanzel.
Online magazine Salon.com on Friday examined the morass of "evidence" offered on myriad blogs and concluded, "As for whether we really do have a Milli Vanilli president, the answer at this point has to be, God only knows."
Driving the latest incendiary blogging is a picture posted on the Internet of Bush during the debate in Florida. Shot from behind, the image shows what appears to be a bulge beneath the president's suit jacket below his shoulder blades.
Robert Thompson, pop culture professor at Syracuse University, called the accusation "the biggest conspiracy theory" of the campaign to date. "Until there's a credible source I'm not sure I buy it," he said.
A recent Pew Internet and American Life Project found more than two million Americans have their own blog. Most have few readers but some garner thousands of hits daily as the American public becomes increasingly distrustful of mainstream media.
Bush isn't alone in being targeted. Conservative bloggers accused Kerry of using a cheat sheet during the first debate and have also issued critiques of his Vietnam war record.
Self-styled Internet commentators scored a victory recently when they questioned the authenticity of documents used by television network CBS to challenge Bush's military service in the National Guard during the Vietnam era. CBS admitted it had been duped into using questionable documents for the report.
Many bloggers have been so partisan that they have even raised money for the candidate of their choice -- something that has led most media watchers to take much of what appears on the sites with more than a grain of salt. (Additional reporting by Michele Gershberg in New York and Adam Entous in Washington)
Didn't Dan Rather speak at a Texas Dem fundraiser some time back? Does that mean Reuters is giving us permission to take what he says with more than a grain of salt?
There is a rumor on the internet that Reuters is so biased that they wrote an article that refers to John Kerry as the "Massachusetts Senator" but never once refers to "Bush" as the President. Couldn't be true, I suppose.
Except for the news part, this pretty well describes Reuters.
"Experts"... would these be the same experts who vetted the National Guard documents?
Ah yes. The old media cooks up a mess o' potage to deligitimize the new media. Just a bunch of cranks...can't believe a word of it...not to be taken seriously.
Why, these crazy right wing bloggers have even taken to questioning Kerry's war record. Far out.
Well, just to be fair, look at DU: they're pretty nutty. This place is a forum where reason rules.
Yeah well, lucky for us we ain't a blog or we'd be lumped right in there with DU trash and space alien junkies.
Although I did enjoy the "Hillary is gonna step in here any time now" conspiracy theory. We just don't do enough of that anymore.
Hehehe...
Maybe it was his bullet proof vest.:)
I like to think of us as "cutting edge". I take "Reuter Rooter" with a grain of salt, myself.
I think both of them were wired up with microphones that usually have a battery pack and transmitter about that size. Did they have video stills of Kerry's back?
I have no problem with people who are openly and honestly partisan- you know where they stand. What kills me is the obviously-biased press, who won't admit it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.