Gorbachev revs up implementation of New World Order

Just one day after the United Nations signed a cooperation agreement with the new International Criminal Court, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev called for implementation of his long-touted "New World Order".

The New World Order, Gorbachev said, will be based on strong adherence to international law and will lean heavily on the UN

Though it's today-the-pond-tomorrow-the-world in spirit, Gorbachev said his New World Order would not seek to impose the view of one country or a group of countries on others. . . . .

Oh please ... enough of the attempt to taint the former Soviet Gorbachev as a continuing Leninist bent on World Government or still adhering to the maxims: "the revolution is a conspiracy" and/or "the revolution does not make sense without terror."

< Yawn >... Communism fell a long time ago.

Even given the occultish and "closed door" nature of the more interesting of the programs a part of Gorby's annual World State confab on "corporate governance" "computer consciousness" "depopulation" and other issues near and dear to the hearts of the CEOs and shakers who attend at $5,000+ a pop, I doubt very seriously that George Bush, Sr. regularly would address our legislative bodies, the United States at large or that our military would bandy about the "New World Order" unless it were a perfectly legitimate and worthwhile goal of these United States.

Relax ... to wit:

This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and Cold War. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of jungle, governs the conduct of nations.
When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders. We have no argument with the people of Iraq. Indeed, for the innocents caught in this conflict, I pray for their safety.
Our goal is not the conquest of Iraq. It is the liberation of Kuwait. It is my hope that somehow the Iraqi people can, even now, convince their dictator that he must lay down his arms, leave Kuwait and let Iraq itself rejoin the family of peace-loving nations.
George H. Bush, January 16, 1991

Under current domestic and international political conditions, the Army leadership can make several operational assumptions about their role in responding to ethnic conflicts. First, with the possible exception of humanitarian relief operations, US involvement will not be unilateral. A growing consensus in the post-Cold War world is that in regional conflicts, if military force is to be used, it should be applied collectively; that is, collective uses of military force can be legitimate means to just ends.[13]
PARAMETERS, US Army War College Quarterly - Spring 1995, citing the Carnegie Corporation's "Self-Determination and the New World Order" (by Morton H. Halperin).
N.B. "Separation precedes federation." V.I. Lenin

"...what is at stake, is more than one small country. It is a big idea. A new world order. Where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace, and security, freedom, and the rule of law.....out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, the new world order, can emerge....Now we can see a new world coming into view, a world in which there is a very real prospect of a new world order...."
George H. Bush, Address to Congress (9/11/1991)
Video link here

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.