Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush and Kerry Better Clarify The World Tonight
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 8, 2004 | Daniel Henninger

Posted on 10/08/2004 5:23:32 AM PDT by OESY

...[T]he policy that Mr. Bush is now arguing before the voters... [is] his Sept. 20, 2001, address to Congress.... [T]his speech ... marked the emergence of the Bush Doctrine."

...Mr. Bush made clear that he believed the world had entered a phase unlike any before: "The United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past.... We cannot let our enemies strike first."

It is not merely Iraq that John Kerry is running against as a "colossal mistake," but the whole sweep of global policy laid out in the Bush national security strategy two years ago. Beyond pre-empting terror at its source, Mr. Bush articulated a vision committed to "free enterprise," pro-growth regulatory policies and low tax rates. "Decades of massive development assistance" he calls "a failed strategy." He includes NATO in his coalitions of the "able and willing" but that is contingent on Europe spending more on defense modernization....

But this isn't Sen. Henry Jackson's liberal democratik or even Joe Lieberman's. It is John Kerry's and that of the modern, post-Vietnam Democratic Party. It would be more accurate to call Mr. Kerry's foreign-policy Soft Realism. Soft Realism will respond if attacked (as stated policy anyway), pursue a consensus policy brokered with France, Germany and the U.N. Secretary General and substitute multilateral sanctions for pre-emptive action.

In a telling moment, Mr. Kerry said that Mr. Bush was "intoxicated with American might." As a soft realist, Mr. Kerry will steer clear of "American might." Mr. Kerry's foreign-policy vision, one suspects, will not be carried out in Baghdad or Kabul but in Georgetown, Geneva and Turtle Bay. (Question for Mr. Kerry: Is the problem not so much that this is the "wrong war," but that it is simply, a war?)....

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; debates; france; iraq; kerry; nato; normanpodhoretz; thatcher; un

1 posted on 10/08/2004 5:23:32 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
The choice before the American people

The world that
Kerry's Coalition of the Unwilling
made for the Vietnamese children
BBC photo of DaNang school children at ceremony commemorating the fall of Saigon

The world that
Bush's Coalition of the Willing
made for the Iraqi children.

2 posted on 10/08/2004 5:30:54 AM PDT by syriacus (I'm commanded to LOVE appeaseniks, but I don't have to VOTE for one as Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

3 posted on 10/08/2004 5:33:21 AM PDT by SuperSonic (I must have lost my mind, because I'm voting for George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Another Choice for the American people - the Kerry/Heinz tab;

WORTH REPEATING.......AND REPEATING........
High Cost of Kerry..this willl amaze!

Here are some facts that most of us either don't know or are just vaguely aware of. But when someone who has gathered some cast figures from government sources and puts figures to some of these expenses....wow! Subject: HIGH COST.. awsome!!!!
It is good to be John F. Kerry....... The F stands for Forbes in case you ever wondered. (I didn't know that either) He is one of the richest Senators in Government. When someone is elected president, it means the Secret Service has to protect the President and his family as well as his property.
The Kerry's have five US properties not counting the several foreign properties they own too.
The cost to run these homes are more than what the average American could afford, even if the rent was free, and all you had to pay the water, gas &electric. Including ground keepers, maintenance, pool, and house keepers. To be President would require the taxpayers to pay for all that now if elected. Including a complete staffed Secret Service security 24 hours a day. In addition to that we will have to pay for each of their homes for security improvements even if they never go to them all, that is, that just in case.
Nevertheless, factor another major cost to Americans that Kerry does not want you to know about.
Becoming president would automatically include taking care of all their properties with Secret Service Agents that includes 5 agents per 6 hour shift 4 times a day 365 days of the year for the rest of their lives so long as they own those properties. It comes with being President, once you are elected. It requires us the taxpayers, to pay for this as well as his annual salary, as well as his retirements including the cost of living adjustments to boot, plus salaries and protection for all their real estate property, plus Secret Service Agents, and pay the bills for the rest of his life. In addition, feed the Secret Service Agents and rotate new ones every 6 hours for the rest of his life.
Do the math. Five properties need to be protected. This requires five Secret Service Agents per shift, daily every six hours, per property! That is 20 Secret Service Agents per day per property everyday including Holidays. Wow, what does that cost?
Lets say an average of 20 agents per property, each earning a about $60K per agent to survey the perimeters and protect. Now times that by five properties so far. That is if the Kerrys do not buy any more properties afterwards. This also includes the Agents vehicles and repairs, gas, meals, days off, paid vacation, and medical plan visits etc per agent.
Who pays? YOU pay, the whole time they are alive after becoming President! Is this the best use of our tax money electing Kerry to take care of all their properties, both foreign and domestic? On the other hand, shouldn't he pay for his own? Yet, the Presidential salary could not afford it.
The more I think about paying for Kerrys properties everyday, just makes me happy keeping President Bush all the more merrier. Without raising taxes to boot.
How on earth would Kerry pay for everyone to have Healthcare, increase our military, and have us pay to protect his investments, all without raising our taxes? ..... Tax and spend Kerry is his party motto .....
Which really has to make you wonder why anyone with his wealth, would take a salary of that of a U.S. Senator, never mind wanna be President? Do you believe now why he needs to be the Prez? To serve the people? On the other hand, the people serve Him and his wife!
So.... now we have yet another reason to keep Bush in the White House and not be concerned with the Kerry Houses.

4 posted on 10/08/2004 5:54:39 AM PDT by yoe ("Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

And Bush better mentioin the goon tactics the democrats are using and let's see Kerry deny it


5 posted on 10/08/2004 6:13:21 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Ah, you know, he just wants to "make a diffence" and "serve the American people". - Actually, this gives a whole new meaning to the term "PUBLIC SERVANT"! Now I understand that the leftists have never meant it in any other context but the public BEING the servant rather than the other way around!


6 posted on 10/08/2004 6:20:27 AM PDT by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OESY

This was really an eye opener. Thanks I will pass this along.


7 posted on 10/08/2004 6:30:52 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Just the fact that Bush's people agreed to this dumb format UNDECIDED VOTERS BS shows again how stupid and cowed they are

I would have refused and said we want a format where there are 5 or so democrats submitting questions to Bush and 5 or so Republicans ( verified ) submitting questions to Kerry

That way we don't get 10 democrats submitting question and if Kerry and the MSM complain TOUGH TAKE IT OR LEAVE It

This debate is a DAMN CHARADE


8 posted on 10/08/2004 10:32:03 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Gibson, alone -- without a panel, gets to select the questions for both Bush and Kerry.

Charlie Gibson, ABC's Liberal Question Man

9 posted on 10/08/2004 11:41:04 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson