Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pulpit Politics [Dems Getting out the Black Vote]
National Review ^ | 10/7/04 | Paul Kengor

Posted on 10/07/2004 8:41:51 AM PDT by MarlboroRed

This past Sunday, John F. Kerry campaigned in a church — the East Mt. Zion Baptist Church in Cleveland. In other words, he did something the liberal press would never permit George W. Bush to do: If Bush were to speak in just one church on the campaign trail, the media would be venting outrage 24/7 — but Kerry will be able to push for votes in churches with complete impunity.

Will Kerry's approach in these churches be as shameless as Al Gore's was in 2000? Gore barnstormed a number of churches in the closing days of the 2000 campaign, with the message that a presidential victory by George W. Bush would be a calamity for black Americans. In a Detroit church on October 29, Gore was introduced by the Rev. Charles Adams as a defender of civil rights — in contrast to Governor Bush, whom Adams described as a protector of the wealthy. Gore (correctly) informed African-American worshipers that they possessed "the ability to decide this close election." From there, the vice president traveled south to address a congregation in Memphis, where he seemed to boil down the choice between him and Bush to one between good and evil. "Deep within us," he said, "we each have the capacity for good and evil. I am taught that good overcomes evil if we choose that outcome. I feel it coming. I feel a message from this gathering that on Tuesday we're going to carry Tennessee and Memphis is going to lead the way." (Remember: George W. Bush cannot describe Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as evil; but Bush himself can be described as evil by Democrats.)

Moving on to Pittsburgh, on November 4, Gore held a rally at the Wesley AME Zion Church. Reverend Gore ascended the pulpit, where he screamed: "Then they rose up like a mighty army and they went to the polls! Let us vote together on Tuesday!" As he had before other African-American audiences, Gore pointed to the murder of James Byrd Jr., a black Texan dragged to his death by three white men in 1998 during the governorship of George W. Bush. He warned of the strict-constructionist judges that a President Bush might appoint, judges of an earlier era when a black American was considered three-fifths of a person.

Gore's dire admonition frightened the worshipers. "I'm concerned now about the future of my kids," said Raushana Ellison, 23, of Pittsburgh's Hill District. Though she had been registered to vote for five years, Ellison had never voted before. Now, she would run to the voting booth. Also attending Gore's church talk was 67-year-old Willa Mae Tot of the Overbrook section of Pittsburgh. She, too, was now worried about Bush and the Republicans: "Their decisions will affect our children and grandchildren. That's who we have to look out for now."

The next day, just two days before the election, Gore was in Philadelphia, where he appeared with the sister of James Byrd, who described in vivid detail her brother's mutilation. The graphic moment was described by the New York Times as "the emotional high point" of Gore's day; the Texas murder, explained the Times, was how Gore "rallied his base." The vice president then politicked in two black churches in Philadelphia. At the second of these, the Morris Brown AME Church, Gore told churchgoers: "There is an old African proverb — when you pray, move your feet. Tuesday is the day to move your feet."

Did this matter in 2000? You bet.

Recall that on the morning of the 2000 presidential vote nearly every poll forecast a comfortable Bush victory. Why was almost every poll wrong? The answer was the African-American vote; that was the great unpredictable that swung the overall total. Al Gore had energized the black vote unlike any politician in recent memory.

In Florida, blacks went for Gore by 93 percent to 7 percent. Even in Texas, where Bush as governor once garnered 25 percent of black votes, he somehow managed to win only 5 percent. While Bush got more white votes in Illinois than Gore, the vice president's 92 percent to 7 percent advantage among blacks gave him Illinois by a staggering 12 points. There were similar results in Maryland, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. In Maryland, Bush won among white voters 51 percent to 46 percent — but the number of black votes was so large that Gore took Maryland handily, with 57 percent.

Blacks have historically voted Democratic by huge margins. In the 2000 contest, however, they voted in much larger percentages than usual. It was this black turnout that pollsters had not foreseen. The lesson of 2000 is obvious to Democrats: When the election gets close, head to African-American churches. (It wasn't just Gore who had been prescient: According to the New York Times, senatorial candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton stumped in seven churches in seven hours on Election Day alone.)

The liberal media will raise nary an eyebrow over this flagrant mixing of church and state; no angry questions from Helen Thomas or irate articles by Dana Milbank and Maureen Dowd. Worse, as breathtakingly preposterous as it may be, John Kerry will go into these houses of God and accuse George W. Bush of trying to divide America by race. And liberals will continue to point the finger at George W. Bush for using God for partisan political purposes.

— Paul Kengor is author of God and George W. Bush. He is also a professor of political science at Grove City College and a visiting fellow with the Hoover Institution.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: blackchurch; blackvote; cleveland; doublestandard; eastmtzionbaptist; electioneering; kerry; politicking
This sort of pulpit politics, combined with the outrageous voter fraud campaign, could well make the difference in FL, OH, PN and MI.
1 posted on 10/07/2004 8:41:52 AM PDT by MarlboroRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarlboroRed

The blatant politicking by the Dems in churches makes me sick. Our pastor has to be careful of every word he says in regard to elections because of the laws concerning politics and non-profit organizations. The Dems break laws over and over again, and nobody does anything about it.


2 posted on 10/07/2004 8:49:08 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Not only do the Democrats break the law, but you're dealing with what Bush calls the warm prejudice of "lower expectations" where the most vile and false tactics are used to portray the Republicans as monsters.

Here's the money line in the article:

"Recall that on the morning of the 2000 presidential vote nearly every poll forecast a comfortable Bush victory. Why was almost every poll wrong? The answer was the African-American vote; that was the great unpredictable that swung the overall total. Al Gore had energized the black vote unlike any politician in recent memory."

If the same happens this November we are in big trouble. Thank God, Kerry seems to have no emotional appeal to Black voters.

3 posted on 10/07/2004 8:54:31 AM PDT by MarlboroRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarlboroRed

A very good article by Dr. Kengor - who really is shaping up to be a major voice in the conservative intelligentsia.

I briefly knew him many years ago, when he was the only thing worth reading in the campus newspaper at Pitt. He has done well for himself since.


4 posted on 10/07/2004 2:07:42 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Very cool. His analysis is righ on target.

Voter fraud (i.e., huge turnout) could well decide this election.

5 posted on 10/07/2004 2:09:01 PM PDT by MarlboroRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarlboroRed

But-the bad news for Kerry is his black support is only in the low to mid 80s from what I've seen.


6 posted on 10/07/2004 2:49:57 PM PDT by RockinRight (John Kerry is the wrong candidate, for the wrong country, at the wrong time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
It's possible. I hope you're right. Dole and Bush, Sr. each picked up close to 15% of the black vote, but I doubt that Bush can do as well.

There's just way too much Bush hatred among black. They still think he stole the election by denying 1 million of them of their votes in 2000, oppose the Iraq war by a large margin, etc.

7 posted on 10/07/2004 3:04:11 PM PDT by MarlboroRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarlboroRed

I just heard an inflammatory radio ad here in Palm Beach where the narrator, clearly identifiable as a black male, rails that blacks have been victimized by the lying SOB Bush and that their proportion of Federal, State and local spending has been gutted at the insistence of the President. There was no pretence of anything related to reason or rationale. It was a call to arms based purely on hysteria.

The gloves are definitely off!


8 posted on 10/07/2004 3:24:45 PM PDT by T. Rustin Noone (T. Rustin Noone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson