Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Puddleglum
I don't need to reread Paul, thank you. Was your comment that he is not immune to dementia a necessary evil? A painful truth? What would you say was its moral status?

My emphasis was on the choice of "necessary" in describing evil from God's point of view.
55 posted on 10/07/2004 8:25:22 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan
My emphasis was on the choice of "necessary" in describing evil from God's point of view.

Well that's the conundrum I always face when thinking about the crucifixion. I mean, we have to accept the means God used to redeem us (human incarnation, suffering, and death). I wonder if the way He chose was 'necessary' based on the nature of how man fell and what man was/is, or if he could have just come down as a big old ball of light and said "I pushed the reboot button - you're all okay again"?

I admit it's hard understanding any evil as necessary yet not a denial of free will. I have to read up on it myself. I know in Exodus it says that God made pharoah obdurate show Moses could display the glory of God.

65 posted on 10/07/2004 8:34:30 AM PDT by Puddleglum (If O'Neill worked for Nixon, who was Kerry working for? Ho Chi Min?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson