To: NotchJohnson
If they are not in another terrorist supporting nation or still buried in the desert, then the scientist were ripping off Saddam because he sure wanted WMD's.
What about the 500 tons of Uranium? I wonder if that doesn't count because the international community said it's "OK" for the Iraqis to have that?
San Diego Union Tribune16 posted on
10/07/2004 6:46:05 AM PDT by
DocRock
('X' marks the spot... where Charley, Frances and Jeanne crossed paths and where I live!)
To: DocRock
What about Saddam's nuclear program that was exposed by his son in law in 1995? How can they say that no WMDs since 1991?
60 posted on
10/07/2004 7:35:05 AM PDT by
Defiant
(The question is, "are you better off now than if Al Gore had been elected in 2000?".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson