Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney proves his irrelevance (Boston Globe)
Boston Globe ^ | October 6, 2004 | Thomas Oliphant

Posted on 10/06/2004 11:02:17 AM PDT by traumer

THE COUNTRY doesn't need Dick Cheney any more. After his 90 minutes on the stage last night, it is clear he is no longer an essential person in politics and government. What he brings to the table are liabilities.

In debate against an opponent with the dangerously attractive attribute of freshness, Cheney paled -- literally. He's not special, it turns out. He doesn't know anything special, he hasn't done anything special, and for the future he doesn't offer anything special.

Cheney is now just another vice president who has had his hour on the stage without really mattering or making a difference. Four years ago, he had a glow of the Wizard of Oz about him, filling an obvious hole in his running mate's background; last night, Cheney was just the grumpy old man behind the curtain.

In presidential campaigns, that is the key to the veeps. They matter if they add something major, help solve a big problem, or provide the second element of a coalition. They are usually more important on the way into office than after they've been there, and last night was no exception.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bowtiedaddy; clueless; oliphant; vpdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2004 11:02:17 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traumer

Sounds like Oliphant has sand in his vagina again.


2 posted on 10/06/2004 11:03:00 AM PDT by Petronski (Report back to headquarters for debriefing . . . . and cocktails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Oliphant's wrong - it's his relevance which is subject to extinction in four weeks, when stories propping up Hanoi John French Kerry & Silky Pony are no longer necessary and, in fact, only a sad rememberance of this truly pathetic campaign that was.


3 posted on 10/06/2004 11:03:41 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

There is no one in the entire world who is more irrelevant than that little bow-tied freak, Thomas Oliphant.


4 posted on 10/06/2004 11:03:43 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (Dan would RATHER lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Uh...are the Dems giving away free crack this morning? Talk about spin cycle...fact is people know what they saw and it ain't what these nasty papers are trying to push...


5 posted on 10/06/2004 11:03:44 AM PDT by shawngf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
The one time I'm actually drinking a milkshake while reading FR you post that.

You almost killed me.

6 posted on 10/06/2004 11:04:28 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traumer

The sand is in his butt.


7 posted on 10/06/2004 11:04:32 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Sorry but I had to post it - it is SO PATHETIC.....


8 posted on 10/06/2004 11:04:40 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

??!! First they tell people that Cheney's the one running the show, now they call him irrelevant?

I agree with the last post: free crack at the DNC.


9 posted on 10/06/2004 11:04:55 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

HAHAHAHAHHAHA


10 posted on 10/06/2004 11:05:19 AM PDT by ArmyBratCutie ("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Oliphant certainly sees the world through his own special glasses, doesn't he? What a sap.


11 posted on 10/06/2004 11:05:55 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

AHAHAAHAHAGAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! (snort)

The Boston Globe strikes a blow for "relevancy"?

PS: Preposterous opinion, BTW. Cheney is a great American. We're lucky to have him serving.


12 posted on 10/06/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Tommy's bow tie is WAY too tight!


13 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:04 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

My, my, he sure is trying hard. Silly Oliphant.


14 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:09 AM PDT by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Man. What a complete crock. Talk about writing what you desperately want everyone to believe!


15 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:14 AM PDT by C65hristine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: traumer

I'd correct the very first line of the column....the contry doesn't need Oliphant any more.


16 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:29 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Edwards batted his eyelashes at Cheney so much I expected him to make a pass at Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Oh man, your comment was the last comment I was expecting to read .... way to funny.


17 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:40 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

18 posted on 10/06/2004 11:06:44 AM PDT by EggsAckley (..........So many vanities.................so little bandwidth............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

"In debate against an opponent with the dangerously attractive attribute of freshness..."

Is this a pick-up line? Does Oliphant want to vote for Edwards, or date him?


19 posted on 10/06/2004 11:07:01 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traumer

HUH?

What debate did this writer watch?

Surely it wasn't last nights debate. Cheney cream boy Edwards.


20 posted on 10/06/2004 11:07:02 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson