Posted on 10/06/2004 7:16:30 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican
For all the horror stories weve heard about euthanasia in recent years, there are still many people who think of it as mercy killing. Those people need to take a long, hard look at whats happening in the Netherlands right now. Its very difficult to find anything merciful about what Dutch doctors are doing to children and infants.
According to Wesley J. Smith in the Daily Standard, Groningen University Hospital in the Netherlands now officially allows doctors to euthanize children under twelve, if doctors believe their suffering is intolerable or if they have an incurable illness. That includes non-fatal illnesses and disabilities. Whether or not the child can consent is irrelevantwhat child under twelve would have a clear idea of what he or she was consenting to?
As Smith writes, For anyone paying attention to the continuing collapse of medical ethics in the Netherlands, this isnt at all shocking. . . . Doctors were [already] killing approximately 8 percent of all infants who died each year in the Netherlands. That amounts to approximately eighty to ninety per year. Of these, one-third would have lived more than a month. At least ten to fifteen of these killings involved infants who did not require life-sustaining treatment to stay alive. The study found that a shocking 45 percent of neo-natologists and 31 percent of pediatricians who responded to questionnaires had killed infants. Smith adds that at least a fifth of the killings were performed without parental consent.
(Excerpt) Read more at pfm.org ...
Ping
The Netherlands has government funded healthcare, correct?
"The Netherlands has government funded healthcare, correct?"
I'm reasonably certain it does.
Terri Sciavo bump......
Europe is in it's death spiral between the birth rate of "Europeans" as compared to the birthrate of un-assimilated muslim immigrants the attitude that euthanasia is not only ok but something to be encouraged & ever expanded upon will lead to a new dark age in Europe .
If I was the 88 yo that found out that the family wanted to off me due to illness there would be some serious rewrites to the personal will.
bump and quick comment
If we can kill someone at the beginning or end of life, why not some other time? Esp. if it's a terrible inconvenience to the rest of us.
Also, there's a story I saw somewhere recently about parents pleading with doctors to keep their baby alive. But the law in Australia gives the doctors the right to determine this, not the parents.
-- Joe
I have a friend in England who says they will have legalized euthanasia within 2 years! So, you are right in saying America is not far behind. After all, look where we are with abortion, gay marriage, polygamy...
And therein lies the problem. When the feeble and the old become a burden to the state, the "Right to Die" will quickly morph into the "Duty to Die". People who do not opt for euthanasia will be seen as greedy and irresponsible.
In twenty years, the person who consumes a half Million dollars worth of medical care at the end of life will be as derided as the "Welfare Queen" of the 1980s.
My father passed on
a few months ago. Before
he died, he was ill
for three or four years.
I got to see in detail
how our medical
system treated him,
and other seniors I met
at his hospital.
It was terrible.
There are endless painful tests,
and throughout it all
people are treated
like machines -- opened up and
closed, parts removed, and
inside systems get
routed outside the body . . .
After a few years
of this, my father
had a long conversation
with his physician,
signed a DNR,
and also insisted no
"catastrophic care"
be used to save him.
I tried to reason with him,
but since I'd witnessed
the way today's care
kept people alive, I felt
torn with every word --
I wanted my dad
to live, but was grief-stricken
seeing him suffer.
I want to live, too,
but our medical system
reduces people
to meat machines, and
that amounts to chronic pain,
chronic medicine
and it amounts to
a daily life turned into
endless days of pain.
After seeing this
in dozens of seniors, I
know why they choose death --
They're not choosing death
per se, rather they're choosing
natural death, not
unnatural life.
The issue isn't clear cut
the way I once thought.
That's fine, but the provision of food and water doesn't constitute "heroic means" of sustaining life.
Republicans who will vote for Obama over Keyes have no problem with this.
"Republicans who will vote for Obama over Keyes have no problem with this."
Sad but true. I was greatly moved by an account of a late-term partial-birth abortion that posted here a few days ago. I remembered seeing my own three sons being born and holding them as soon as they were swaddled. And then I thought of the innocent and helpless emerging from their mothers' wombs only to be immediately killed. How in the hell can anyone who has children, or cares about children, or cares about anything important, not even think for a moment about the horror of this?
The bill in Illinois to allow partial-birth abortion was supported by Barck Obama.
When the bill comes up for euthanasia, I think we know where Obama will stand.
When the "provision"
of food and water requires
tubes forced down the throat
it's reasonable
for that person to decide
they'd rather not live
if their condition
showed no hope of improvement.
(I've talked to seniors
in exactly this
horrible situation.)
From a Christian view,
it is kind of strange
so many people react
as if death itself
were an inherent
evil. Christ often warned us
not to get attached
to this world, warned us
not to love life in this world. (1)
(And we know early
Christians followed Christ
because they had so little
fear of death even
Aurelius (2) was
unable to understand
what lay behind it.)
I don't think any
aspect of this issue is
straightforward to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) John 12:24-26
"Most assuredly, I say to you,
unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies,
it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain.
He who loves his life will lose it,
and he who hates his life in this world
will keep it for eternal life. If anyone serves Me,
let him follow Me; and where I am,
there My servant will be also.
If anyone serves Me, him My Father will honor."
(2) "What a soul that is which is ready, if at any moment it
must be separated from the body, and ready either to be
extinguished or dispersed or continue to exist; but so
that this readiness comes from a man's own judgement, not
from mere obstinacy, as with the Christians, but
considerately and with dignity and in a way to persuade
another, without tragic show." [Meditations, 11:3]
Really? What's so bad about that? You don't even have to chew. I had my mouth wired shut one time and had to drink and "eat" through a straw for a month. It wasn't that big a deal. It was nice to get back on solid food again though.
John 12:24-26
We are to die SPIRITUALLY to the old man, THEN the NEW man can live. God is not telling us to DIE PHYSICALLY so as to be of some good and be able to be used. Talk about twisting scripture!!! Get behind me.....
If you are using this scripture to justify Mercy killings???? Well......
So... Hitler wasn't so bad after all. (sarcasm of course).
I must meet these wonderfully courageous and progressive health care officials in the Netherlands!
As Queen of AmeriKa, and mistress of choice, I must congratulate their great advances for the Sacrament of Choice.
No unwanted or sickly child left alive!! Hail Molech!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.