Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: nypokerface
bwahahahahaha
sorry, charlie.
To: nypokerface
It's called a backfire, Charley, you dumbass.
Eat another sandpaper donut.
3 posted on
10/05/2004 8:30:30 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: nypokerface
Is that saying about being "hoisted by your own petard" appropriate here?
To: nypokerface
WOW...Ole Charlie is such an idiot.
To: nypokerface
He sponsored it before he was against it. Rangel is the standard by which all Democrats should measure themselves.
7 posted on
10/05/2004 8:34:37 PM PDT by
etradervic
(If Kerry is the answer, could you please repeat the question?)
To: nypokerface
*snort!*
(I love it when a plan comes together!)
8 posted on
10/05/2004 8:35:38 PM PDT by
Monkey Face
(I don't believe in superstition; it only brings bad luck.)
To: nypokerface
If you can't run with the big dogs, don't get off the porch.
Quote you will NOT hear from Rangel:
"I love it when a plan comes together"
To: nypokerface
10 posted on
10/05/2004 8:40:38 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
To: nypokerface
"I actually voted for my own draft bill.... before I voted against it."
11 posted on
10/05/2004 8:41:26 PM PDT by
gogipper
(Zell Miller -- At last a Democrat who isn't truth impaired.....Give 'em hell Zell.)
To: nypokerface
12 posted on
10/05/2004 8:41:37 PM PDT by
mentor2k
To: nypokerface
Translation: Rangel wants his bill out there, hanging, never actually voted upon. What a friggin' joke.
14 posted on
10/05/2004 8:45:23 PM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: nypokerface
What is the H 'bill number'.
To: nypokerface
I met a co worker yesterday that was very worried the draft was on the way back.
She was shocked and did not believe all of the bills sponsors were democrats.
I made a bet with her that I would vote for John Kerry, if she could find one republican who would vote for it and she would have to vote for Bush, if I was right.
I'm not counting on her to keep her word, she is a democrat after all.
17 posted on
10/05/2004 8:58:11 PM PDT by
Popman
(Mozilla Rules, I.E. Drools)
To: nypokerface
Another "brilliant" rat idea bites the dust.
20 posted on
10/05/2004 9:09:50 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(The ENEMY for Kerry!!!!!)
To: nypokerface
HEHEHEE...someone forgot to tell Charlie that it would be a DNC talking point during the elections. Bwaaaaaaaahhaha
To: nypokerface
Yessiree, it's an important bill, far too important to vote for or to pass or anything, so important you have to vote against it. Especially if you're for it. Or if you're not for it but you want your opponents to be for it and they're not cooperating. Yeah, that's it.
To: nypokerface
As I understand it (according to a local radio host), almost all the bill's sponsors voted against it, except for Fortney Stark.
To: nypokerface
Only Murtha and Stark voted yes.
I hate Pete Stark, but give him a little credit for consistency.
28 posted on
10/05/2004 9:26:42 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("Dead or alive, I got a .45 - and I never miss!!!" - AC/DC - Problem Child)
To: nypokerface
He voted it for it before he voted against it. It's called the Kerry plie.
To: nypokerface
Earlier on another thread I said it was buried. My congressman's aid called me back and told me that the reason they brought the bill out was to force the vote and get rid of it and hopefully the rumors.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
