To: TheLion
Clinton used Halliburton with no bid contracts in Bosnia and Ksosvo. Surprised Cheney didn't stick that in Edwards ear but then again there wasn't any more room.
480 posted on
10/05/2004 8:27:56 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
(Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
To: jwalsh07
Are you series? I have honestly never heard that. Why in the hell would he not have brought that up? Did he think it was better to leave the issue alone?
As an aside, does anyone know how many people Halliburton employs? Apparently the Kerry-Edwards campaign would prefer that they get sh*tcanned because Halliburton is never given another gov contract.
537 posted on
10/05/2004 8:31:47 PM PDT by
HRoarke
(John Edwards-You're No Dan Quayle!)
To: jwalsh07
Was it just me or did the so called "moderator" keep giving edwards an "extra" "rebuttal" to Cheney's "30 second" rebuttals??
540 posted on
10/05/2004 8:31:59 PM PDT by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: jwalsh07; NotchJohnson
Cheney would have needed another hour and a half to counter all the lies that Edwards threw out. What he did chose to counter was very persuasive.
Cheney crushed Edwards. The spinners are going nuts right now!
561 posted on
10/05/2004 8:33:26 PM PDT by
TheLion
To: jwalsh07
The only company that could do the job like Halliburton in Iraq would be a FRENCH company named Schlumberger. Why the *ell would we allow them to get the job when they wouldn't even support the United States in a time of war while they were profiting through a criminal conspiracy in the "Oil for Food" SCANDAL?! PUKE!
611 posted on
10/05/2004 8:37:17 PM PDT by
kcvl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson