Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THIRTY STATES READY TO BAN ABORTION IF ROE OVERTURNED
AP ^ | 10/05/04 | Jim Abrams

Posted on 10/05/2004 2:08:24 PM PDT by onyx

By Jim Abrams ASSOCIATED PRESS 11:01 a.m. October 5, 2004

WASHINGTON – Thirty states are poised to make abortion illegal within a year if the Supreme Court reversed its 1973 ruling establishing a woman's legal right to an abortion, an advocacy group said Tuesday.

The Center for Reproductive Rights said some states have old laws on the books that would be triggered by the overturning of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision. Others have language in their state constitutions or strongly anti-abortion legislatures that would act quickly if the federal protection for abortion was ended and the issue reverted to the states.

"The building blocks are already in place to recriminalize abortion," said Nancy Northup, the center's president.

The group's report comes less than a month before the presidential election, which those on both sides of the abortion issue say will be critical in determining the future of the Roe decision.

Currently, it is believed that five of the nine justices support abortion rights, but that balance could be tipped if President Bush, in a second term, nominates a new justice who reflects his anti-abortion views. Democratic contender John Kerry is a strong supporter of abortion rights.

The center found that 18 states had pre-Roe laws totally or partially banning abortion. In some cases those laws have been blocked by a court, but could easily be revived if Roe were overturned. Alabama is one state where the abortion ban was never enjoined by the courts, and could be immediately enforced.

Other states such as Ohio don't have abortion bans, but both the legislature and the governor oppose abortion and without Roe there would likely be a rush to pass legislation banning abortion, the center said.

It concluded that 21 states are at high risk, and nine states at middle risk, of banning abortion within a year of Roe being overturned. More than 70 million women of childbearing age would be affected, the center said.

Another 20 states, including Massachusetts, which has a pre-Roe ban, would likely retain abortion rights because of other statutory protections or the makeup of their legislatures.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a leading opponent of abortions, agreed that 30 states or more would move to restrict or curtail abortion if Roe was overturned. "The court is out of step with the rest of America," he said. "I have no doubt that you would see a majority of the states take action to protect unborn children and their mothers."

"We are really, I think, in some peril now," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., one of 11 abortion rights lawmakers to attend the center's Capitol Hill news conference.

The only Republican was Rep. Chris Shays, R-Conn., who said that Roe v. Wade was "an extraordinarily important document" and "we need to elect more pro-choice Republicans to the Congress."

The 21 states considered at high risk of banning abortion were: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The nine at middle risk: Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.

The 20 at lower risk: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; deception; distortions; frc; lies; medialies; propaganda; redvsblue; roevwade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
LOOK at the use of "high risk of banning abortion"

NO agenda or bias there. (sarcasm)

1 posted on 10/05/2004 2:08:24 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onyx

in Roe v. Wade.... Roe won, right?


2 posted on 10/05/2004 2:09:20 PM PDT by PureSolace (I love freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

If only this were true!


3 posted on 10/05/2004 2:09:25 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
More than 70 million women of childbearing age would be affected, the center said. What the hell does this mean?
4 posted on 10/05/2004 2:09:58 PM PDT by alisasny ("BREAKING: PETA OUTRAGED, Kerry to use hampsters to fire spitballs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

The 21 states considered at low risk of keeping abortion were: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The nine at middle risk: Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.

The 20 at high risk: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.

There we go


5 posted on 10/05/2004 2:10:53 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Tryin' to skeer da wemin'.


6 posted on 10/05/2004 2:10:55 PM PDT by sinkspur ("I exist in the fevered swamps of traditional arcana. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny

Well look at this quote from this horrid female!


""The building blocks are already in place to recriminalize abortion,"" said Nancy Northup, the center's president.


7 posted on 10/05/2004 2:11:04 PM PDT by onyx (Please don't be a FReeloader. Be a FReepin monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I'm sorry, but this article was written to "remind" women that Bush is pro life and Kerry will let the baby killing continue as abortion "rights". Bush has good numbers among women, and the liberals want to take some of them away by reminding them they "could" lose the right to kill their unborn children if Bush is elected and Roe is overturned.


8 posted on 10/05/2004 2:12:06 PM PDT by PilloryHillary (John Kerry is a traitor www.johnfkerrysucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny

So if abortion is so supported by the people why are 30 states ready to ban it?


9 posted on 10/05/2004 2:12:33 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"The building blocks are already in place to recriminalize abortion,"

Yeah lady, we want you to return to the "bad-old days" of women having abortions in squalid back alleys using coathangers (cue the obligatory, cartoon pic of dark alleyways strewn about with metal trashcan lids, with the black cat passing by and a shadowy figure in a trenchcoat).

10 posted on 10/05/2004 2:13:27 PM PDT by ServesURight (Tim Michels for U.S. Senate Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

It would surprise me if Roe v. Wade would be overturned. I don't think this court has the stomach to do something like this. They would forever be demonized by the left and the MSM. This is just trying to hype the pro-choice group to get out and vote.


11 posted on 10/05/2004 2:14:08 PM PDT by Moconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The baby-killers know the end is near. Kerry will lose in a landslide, Bush will pick 1 or 2 conservative Supremes, and Roe v Wade will be a trivia question.

The dinosaurs in the Yucatan peninsula are looking up at the comet in the sky.

12 posted on 10/05/2004 2:16:24 PM PDT by No-Compromise Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight

LOLOLOLOL


13 posted on 10/05/2004 2:17:12 PM PDT by No-Compromise Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: No-Compromise Conservative

Such terror-inspiring words...to gutless liberals, that is.


14 posted on 10/05/2004 2:20:43 PM PDT by KStorm (I support a woman's right to an abortion, unless the life of the child is at stake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx
Why doesn't the AP just print The Center for Reproductive Rights' press releases directly and save the trouble of putting their reperterette's time into the article?

You can just smell the bias, can't you?

16 posted on 10/05/2004 2:22:38 PM PDT by AngryJawa (Happiness Is A Silent Blissninny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
I think they realized they were "Duped". Roe is a born-again Christian. She says she was manipulated, used, etc. She has even marched in Washington DC in Pro-Life marches.

I thought it was great. An east coast state was preparing to enact a license plate that said "Choose Life". The liberals were in arms. The legislator said, "We can always have license plate that says "Choose Death" I think America is finally waking up and saying, "ENOUGH!".

Pray for President Bush, he will need it. He has more than one enemy ya know...
17 posted on 10/05/2004 2:23:34 PM PDT by Bush or Kerry You decide (...one nation under God...,it's not one nation over Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: No-Compromise Conservative

Your take is the same as mine.
Let's pray we're right.


18 posted on 10/05/2004 2:24:47 PM PDT by onyx (Please don't be a FReeloader. Be a FReepin monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Homosexual Marriage/Civil Unions is an issue best left to the States (unless that State votes to ban it, in which case it becomes hate and intolerance and needs to be overturned by a liberal judge), but Abortion on demand is a Federal issue? Can somebody explain that to me?


19 posted on 10/05/2004 2:24:53 PM PDT by truthchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"We are really, I think, in some peril now," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., one of 11 abortion rights lawmakers to attend the center's Capitol Hill news conference.

No, Rep. Slaughter, you're not at any risk at all. Neither are your adult friends. It's the preborn who are at risk. Please pay attention to the substance of the issue and the debate.

20 posted on 10/05/2004 2:25:48 PM PDT by GretchenM (A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson