Posted on 10/05/2004 7:52:29 AM PDT by LavaDog
The supposedly 'professional' supposedly 'objective' journalists are capable of completely setting aside all of their (liberal) biases EXCEPT when they get up close and personal with real Americans.
If their much vaunted professional objectivity fails there...why is it supposedly infallible all the rest of the time?
Very insightful comment from this NCO.
Journalism professors don't like the military embedding program because it makes the military look good. They hate that.
This is the best thing Kaplan has ever written. It's true.
I was a newspaper reporter and graduate of Columbia Journalism School before I was drafted in 1966. I did a tour of duty in the Army in Vietnam in 1968-69 and was so disgusted by the gap (canyon) between what I saw with my own eyes in Vietnam and what the reporters were saying about it that I quit journalism in disgust when I got back to the US. The average journalist has no idea how to talk to an NCO or private.
That began to change as the military remained larger post-Korea and during the Cold War (necessitating a larger officer corps with the resulting class levening) and completely disappeared with the Vietnam War. By 1970, officers were pariahs in polite society.
Bump
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "And the Debate Winner is -- Lemony Snicket"
If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.
This is an awesome line in an exceptional (must read) article. (One of many)
Loved the question at the beginning about why the media is concerned with military imbeds losing their perspective when jounalists are continuously imbedded with politicians, academics, etc., and no one questions their losing their perspective about those settings.
I went into a public-'ouse to get a pint o' beer,
The publican 'e up an' sez, "We serve no red-coats here."
The girls be'ind the bar they laughed an' giggled fit to die,
I outs into the street again an' to myself sez I:
O it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, go away";I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
But it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play,
The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
O it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play.
They gave a drunk civilian room, but 'adn't none for me;
They sent me to the gallery or round the music-'alls,
But when it comes to fightin', Lord! they'll shove me in the stalls!
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, wait outside";
But it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide,
The troopship's on the tide, my boys, the troopship's on the tide,
O it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide.Yes, makin' mock o' uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an' they're starvation cheap;
An' hustlin' drunken soldiers when they're goin' large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin' in full kit.
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll.We aren't no thin red 'eroes, nor we aren't no blackguards too,
But single men in barricks, most remarkable like you;
An' if sometimes our conduck isn't all your fancy paints,
Why, single men in barricks don't grow into plaster saints;
While it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, fall be'ind",
But it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind,
There's trouble in the wind, my boys, there's trouble in the wind,
O it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind.You talk o' better food for us, an' schools, an' fires, an' all:
We'll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
Don't mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
The Widow's Uniform is not the soldier-man's disgrace.
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;
An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please;
An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool -- you bet that Tommy sees!
Excellent article ping.
as an NCO in the Reserves it might not be as apparent to me but I sure can see where he is coming from.
I was going to paste that same line!
Kaplan is terrific, his work on the coming global anarchy is priceless.
Ditto. I graduated from the UGA Grady School of Journalism (with double major in pol. sci)in '83. Fortunately, I went to work for a Navy newspaper while my husband was a flight student, and saw early "my heroes" of journalism and how they acted when covering a media-frenzied article 32 hearing in Pensacola (late '88). I was shocked and appalled to say the least, at the malicious ambitiousness of these slimebags (most are still reporting today). Maybe I was naive, but they didn't follow any tenets of journalism I was ever taught (thank you, Grady).
They even hit the base day-care center asking if kids of those involved ever had bruises on their arms...they were too lazy to learn anything cultural about the services, but no stone went unturned when trying to dig up the dirt.
(They spoke freely to me as I was hanging out with the Wash. Post reporter and they thought I was one of them.)
I recently asked the very lib editor of the Atlanta Journal Constitution this question: "you say it's wrong that most congressmen don't have sons or daughters serving in the U.S. military, but don't you believe it's just as wrong that most journalists have no experience with military service?" Of course, I got no answer.
It's time the stereotypes were broken about our services. I encourage any military person to keep on writing and competing with the biased views. Let's show 'em who we really are!
Robert Kaplan is their best writer, IMO. I try to read every article & book this guy produces. If you want to get a handle on the problems of the Balkans, get his book "Balkan Ghosts." It really puts the entire region and its problems into context.
Those of us in the lower tiers of America, who are continually told that our "betters" think far deeper thoughts than we do, that they see far more clearly the correct ways to go than we do, should simply bow to the new aristocracy and accept their superior intellect.
If you don't accept it from me, then take it Dan democRATher
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.