In time, we are going to have to give up California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Hopefully, we can "save" those states immediately to the north. It's coming, and it won't be long, folks. California is close to - or past - the "tipping point" now. The whites and "productive people" are already packing up and leaving, along with their businesses.
I don't see any other possible future for the southwest, myself. In this case, it will be a matter of "demographics uber alles". Neither party seems interesting in stemming the flood of illegals streaming in across the border. It's a case of "open borders", or "open borders, lite" - take your choice.
And there's no point in denying that the overwhelming majority of them are Mexican or otherwise Central or South American. In time, we will have to deal with a "new flood" of South Americans coming over (more than do now). This will be almost guaranteed under the next Democratic administration, for, when she comes to power, the borders will be all but "erased" as a functioning line of national demarcation.
The "latino map" is interesting, because there _are_ some sections of the country that continue to exist _without_ a measure of the illegal influx. I recently spent some time in an Eastern state (I will not say where)... where I specifically looked for illegals, as I'm considering relocating there. I found none to speak of... didn't see _any_. My reasoning is there is no financial benefits for them to be there - no opportunities for "cheap labor", other than the farm harvest season. Out that way, folks mow their own lawns and hire other anglos for the home repairs.
Eventually, Atzlan will come to be. I'm of the mind that by the time its reality looms, Anglo-Americans will not fight to retain it in the Union. If anything, white America will be _relieved_ to let Atzlanians have their "freedom"....
Cheers!
- John
You think the rats will let those electoral votes get away?? Har Har.