Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro; justshe
What??? Are you now claiming a statute of limitations on cheating? (Sounds like a Carville/Begala line.)

You're still missing the point. Whether Bush failed to say something then (if you assume he saw) or if he doesn't want to make a point of it doesn't matter.

This FRAUD wants to be our president and we have a say as to what WE WANT TO MAKE AN ISSUE. As with the Swiftvets & Kerry's military record and with Dan Rather's & the democrat supplied forged TANG documents, Bush and company can decide not to challenge. But that doesn't mean we have to fall in line and keep quit. After all if we wanted to be mindless party hacks waiting for the party line, we would be democrats.

Whatever you point is - the number of posts on this thread is about to pass 1,000 (while over 30,000 have viewed it). So I'd say your objections aren't doing much good. But, if you're intentions are honest, keep following this issue and you may get the real point eventually.

989 posted on 10/03/2004 6:52:33 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]


To: drpix
I guess it has to do with if you think Bush won or lost. Now if you are to push the ethical angle be careful - because for it not to look like Bush campaign trying to save a loss/sour grapes - the consensus has to be that Bush won - and the consensus is that Bush lost the debate.
992 posted on 10/03/2004 7:01:18 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson