[FairOpinion]

I think the Democrats KNOW, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Kerry cannot not win.

Their strategy is two fold:

1. Commit however much fraud is necessary to get Kerry enough votes to win.

2. Put out enough propaganda, to make the election at least APPEAR to be close enough, so when they win by fraud, it won't be immediately apparent, that Kerry couldn't possibly have won without fraud.

This is why it is absolutely CRUCIAL and CRITICAL that we get out the vote: All Republicans and conservatives must get out and vote for President Bush and take a few others along, to vote for Bush. If we don't do that, the Democrats may well be successful in stealing this election -- and remember, our very lives depend on it.

[MegaSilver]

I was talking about this with some acquaintances earlier today. We think it's not unlikely that Kerry could score a victory, driven entirely by vote fraud.

[Theodore R.]

What would Robert M. La Follette, Sr., say today about all the fraud and chicancery in his beloved WI? La Follette thought he had wiped out such infractions among his WI citizenry. Guess the fraud was too imbedded to remove completely

[talleyman]

Please bump the vote fraud thread.

[dufekin]

Bush probably will concede if Kerry wins by fraud. Hence, we need a lead at least 10-20% in most states, 35-50% in key states--just to have a chance at breaking even. Bush is well on the way to losing the election.

[backhoe]

Crosslinked:

-The Vote Fraud Archives--

...and BTW, you are right-

[BIGZ]

Fraud?

As long as the system does not make identification at the voting place mandatory you will have fraud.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

They know Kerry will not carry the day for them on his own, even given the 5-10 points they benefit from massive MSM biased "reporting". Thus, they seek another 1-2 points via vote fraud.

Although alternative media and aggressive counter by the Right is diminishing the MSM impact, the vote fraud effort IMO is getting more sophisticated year by year, and I agree must be countered much more aggressively.

You didn't mention another outcome: Given a Bush win, a close election buys them another four years of "no mandate, illegitimate election" mantra to stoke their base and justify hardball obstruction of the GOP starting November 3rd. This is why GW will have to move full speed on judicial nominations right away through 2005, and prepaqre for the "battle royale" over the SCOTUS appointments in 2006.