To: dandelion
This man is a danger to this country, and he must not be allowed to be in charge of anything.
24 posted on
09/30/2004 11:47:07 PM PDT by
ladyinred
("John Kerry reporting for spitball and typewriter duty.")
To: ladyinred
The most frustrating part of the debate to me was the fact that Bush didn't challenge F'ing Kerry about many of his lies abd also his OUTRAGEOUS statements such as ridding US of OUR NUKES!!! What the H is he trying to do? Without our Nukes we are even with many other countries and our defenses are a lot weaker.
The President also should have challenged F'ing Kerry about the statements that he was going to rid the former soviet Union of all their nukes in 4 years...SAY WHAT???
I must admit, I was not happy with the performance of the Prez. I was in my car driving back to Raleigh from Wilmington so I didn't get to see the facial expressions and body language that some pundits are talking about but I was SCREAMING at my radio to try to wake the Prez up. He almost seemed drugged on sedatives ....before each answer there was a hesitation that was driving me crazy. He really let a great opportunity to slam F'ing Kerry go unused.....
27 posted on
09/30/2004 11:53:37 PM PDT by
The PeteMan
(Go to H*ll Dan Rather!)
To: ladyinred
"This man is a danger to this country, and he must not be allowed to be in charge of anything.He sure is. Why does he think we're researching bunker-busting nukes? It's because Iran is building nuclear weapons labs inside mountains where they can't be attacked with conventional bombs, and North Korea is building hardened missile silos within miles of their Chinese border so we will not attack the missiles with full-sized nukes. Kerry is such a fool on the issue of national security. He has not moved away from his ultra left wing anti-military position from the 1970s.
Sometimes we have to develop weapons that we hope to never use to give us a stronger negotiating position. When Iran and North Korea know we can destroy their nuclear facilities with small nuclear weapons (and without disturbing their neighbors), then these rogue states have to negotiate with us. Kerry is sending a clear signal that his election could be a catastrophic disaster for America.
28 posted on
10/01/2004 12:04:06 AM PDT by
carl in alaska
(Throw deep........you're already in the fourth quarter.)
To: ladyinred
Give Iran uranium and then shut own program down? What an nuance!
58 posted on
10/01/2004 7:45:40 AM PDT by
Sybeck1
(Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
To: ladyinred
"This man is a danger to this country, and he must not be allowed to be in charge of anything."
What about the public library in mayberry?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson