Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2004 10:35:24 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Pokey78

How many people actually stayed with the entire debate, with so many other options available to watch?
My guess is not very many. They would watch 30 minutes or so and feel they had seen quite enough.
This is NOT a disaster, folks. I am SO tired of the gloom and doom over this stupid debate, with Kerry up there like a peacock lying about everything, in collusion with the moderator.
I don't think the average guy is voting for Kerry based on the debate this evening. If so, they were already. Or they will forget to vote entirely on November 2.


43 posted on 09/30/2004 10:55:24 PM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

The author seems to have drunk the Klintoon Kool-Aid a wee too many times last evening. Lurch's undoing will be the manner in which he so glibly spewed lies and half-truths throughout the question and answer session (it wasn't a debate). His guile won't stand up to thinking people.


44 posted on 09/30/2004 10:56:06 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I think Jay is overreacting. He didn't mention John F*ckin's gaffes: 1) higher taxes, 2) global test, 3) shutting down bunker-buster bomb production and 4) giving Iran's Mad Mullahs an atom bomb courtesy of Uncle Sam. I'm really disappointed Jay came down so hard on the President. Yeah he could have done a better job but he didn't make any fatal mistakes. On the hand, Kerry committed four Big Bloopers. They'll be remembered on Election Day.


49 posted on 09/30/2004 10:59:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Wow this guy rambles just like JFKerry, no wonder he thought he won with all those lies.
50 posted on 09/30/2004 11:00:05 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Just as I'd expected since the style of the debate was to consistently pressure President Bush to defend his policies while leaving Kerry's decades long record of shame off-limits.


52 posted on 09/30/2004 11:00:29 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Bang! I just shot him!

For choosing style over substance.
He thinks that Kerry will awe the sheeples in the debates.

Hope he's wrong.

Look for Bush to come out swinging in the next one.

54 posted on 09/30/2004 11:01:05 PM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
My impression:

Kerry was at his best in terms of style, delivery and stateliness. Bush did not appear to be in command of the facts and did not seem well-prepared. He seemed to miss many opportunities to counter Kerry's arguments and often seemed halting and searching for something to say. At times, he even seemed a bit whiney in his responses. He just wasn't at his best -- Kerry was.

Hopefully, most people will vote based on their cumulative impression of "flip-flop" and their confidence in W's demonstrated ability.

55 posted on 09/30/2004 11:01:28 PM PDT by NilesJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Kerry said he would dramatically increase the armed forces and send troops to Africa, etc..this saound like he wants a draft.

Also kind of scary was the freudian slip where Kerry said that he has been "fighting for proliferation of wmd", then correct to say "fighting against..."


56 posted on 09/30/2004 11:02:01 PM PDT by dahvid (put that in your pipe and smoke it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I'm sorry, but I have to pretty much agree with the author's assessment. Of course there was no substance in any of Kerry's blather - there never is. He was, however, much more polished than President Bush in his delivery. If you were simply to read the transcripts of this debate, you'd probably think that Bush came out slightly ahead. Under the unforgiving lights of live television, Kerry won on points.

There were some positives to come out of this debate. I have a feeling that people are going to hear the soundbite about the global test over and over up until the election. Karl Rove will do a great job of getting out the fact that Kerry's basic message was "Saddam Hussein was dangerous but we shouldn't have taken him out without making sure that the rest of the world didn't mind."

I'm not panicked in the least after the debate, but I do think this is still a tight contest. The Bush campaign needs to attack Kerry relentlessly, especially about Kerry's betrayal of American servicemen when he came back from Vietnam. Why isn't that message being pounded on every single campaign ad that we see?
58 posted on 09/30/2004 11:04:12 PM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Unfortunately this is a fair critique of tonight's debate. Sorry to disagree with fellow FR folks who I hold in high regard. But to not acknowledge a problem IMHO is a bad idea.


59 posted on 09/30/2004 11:05:28 PM PDT by LiberalBassTurds ('Beheading' - Target marketing technique for sociopath recruitment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
My response:

Kerry Wins Formal Debate, But Bush Wins News Coverage Debate

Read and watch tomorrow's news summaries of the debate. Bush's basic points are getting reported. Since I doubt many swing voters were glued to their sets tonight, I think the news coverage will have more influence. Also, Kerry gave up some great sound bytes (Global Test) that will come back to bite him.
61 posted on 09/30/2004 11:07:07 PM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I say........POLISH vs. SUBSTANCE
66 posted on 09/30/2004 11:09:25 PM PDT by ALASKA (For every victim of terrorism, we should take out ten family members of the responsible terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Look on the bright side: this was as good as Kerry gets. We all know Bush can do better, and he will.


67 posted on 09/30/2004 11:11:16 PM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Yep!!!!! I Love Bush, and I think he's a great man. I think he's a straight up "good man".

I'll never get it. I'll never understand,....

I'm sick of "weak" people trying to speak for me. This includes every file you can think up,......including a National Championship, and a must win National home coaching project!! whatever big boy!! I'm sick of missing my husband that I would
70 posted on 09/30/2004 11:12:23 PM PDT by SmellsLikeOwen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

The phrase "Don't shoot the messenger" ought only be used when one is delivering a fact based message, not opinion, so Jay got off to a bad start.


71 posted on 09/30/2004 11:12:40 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I have to say I agree with you. But you have to realize the President has been working all week with the weight of the world on his shoulders, back to back campaigning, and slogging through the wreckage of hurricanes to help Floridians. Not windsurfing off Nantucket or get 'bronzed'.....


73 posted on 09/30/2004 11:13:28 PM PDT by motherofmen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78; All

Maybe I am crazy, I thought it could have gone much, much worse for us. When the debate ended, I thought Kerry didn't land a crippling blow. I thought like Lockhart that it was a draw-- which means Kerry lost, but Kerry does appear to be winning the post-deabte spin decisively.


74 posted on 09/30/2004 11:13:40 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Hate to say it as I loathe Kerry, but he won the debate (but not by a huge margin).
He delivered his lines well even though most were whoopers (NYC subway closed? huh? when?). Was eagerly awaiting bush to pounce on his rebuttals was often disappointed. He the Used "wrong war wrong time" line too much, when he could have attacked Kerry's Flip Flops with many more examples.
But the all important spin can go to Bush as Kerry made some big missteps that the non political person might have missed but make good sound bites such as

His many Gore-ish outright lies and exaggerations.

This election's "lock-box"...."Global-test" Bush's reaction was priceless. Beat Kerry over the head with it.

Did he say he would give Iran nuclear matteral, right after slamming bush on North Korea? How the Hell does that make us safer Mr Kerry?

Kerry said "I have a plan" about 1000 times, did he ever get around to telling us what exactly it was?

And another Shocking insight on Kerry, saying he would kill the new bunker busters and next generation of US nukes in the name of nonproliferation. HUH? Bush could have nailed him on all the other weapons Kerry voted against defending the country at this moment but missed it. As Dick Morris said on Fox "Were does he think the WMD's are kept in the store front window?"

I'm spent forgive my long ramble
77 posted on 09/30/2004 11:16:19 PM PDT by frank-the-tank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I think Kerry energized his base, but that's about all. He still comes across as a pompous jerk to the average Joe.


79 posted on 09/30/2004 11:17:46 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I didn't think it was grim at all. Bush did fine. Many of the questions posed were obviously written to put Bush in a bad position. A lot of his answers had to be basic and from the heart, because specifics would endager foreign policy. He is the SITTING PRESIDENT. He can't just break into rambling theory on what he would like to do about Iran or N. Korea, because anything he says during the debate will be taken literally on the bargaining table overseas tomorrow morning.

What's he supposed to do? Let all of our policy and battle plans out of his sleeves just because of a debate? He can't. He's tied to the office and in the middle of a war. I thought he projected honesty and integrity. And it was obvious in a few places that he was very upset that he couldn't just gush the whole truth of a situation at the American people. That's the kind of man you want in office.

It doesn't matter one bit if you can't speak as eloquently as your opponent, as long as the vast majority of people can look you in the eyes and know they can trust you with their lives.

Kerry, on the other hand, had all the polish of a used car salesman. Not a statesman. The kind of person you get stuck dealing with when you buy a car. You don't want to, but you're forced to listen to him. And if you have ANY other good option you take it. Bush is definately a GOOD alternative to what Kerry projects.


90 posted on 09/30/2004 11:22:25 PM PDT by Advil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson