Skip to comments.
Kerry Lied in Debate
gop.com ^
| 9-30-04
| GOP.COM
Posted on 09/30/2004 8:23:01 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-211 next last
To: tomnbeverly
Can't forget Vietnam.
Four references, by my count.
Kerry is unabashedly dwelling in the past, a relic, truly a 9/10 antique not worth a second look.
121
posted on
09/30/2004 10:13:28 PM PDT
by
Chummy
("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
To: Chummy
Concur and I think it was five... references...
Swifties need to get on message hard now.. As this pompous fart tries to use the war he defamed to support his politics...
122
posted on
09/30/2004 10:17:29 PM PDT
by
tomnbeverly
(Don't let John Kerry put a price on our childrens heads bear any burden pay any cost elect GW.)
To: elephantman96
Second, he [Bush] wanted to beat home a couple specific messages. You are entirely correct IMO. This debate goes to Bush in the only category that matters: who wins the election. I only remember a couple of things about the debate, though I watched intently. Kerry fired a continual barrage of crap that was literally too much to correct. Bush stayed on point. Bush has belief in being consistent and steady, which he demonstrated by almost ignoring Kerry and driving home his basic points. Three days from now, the people who love Kerry will still love him. But the independents will have forgotten any nuanced views and will remember their gut feelings, which the polls have already confirmed. Thus, they will vote with who they are comfortable with as a strong leader, if they bother to vote at all.
Add to this million undecideds who are going to listen to Rush tomorrow, "even though they don't agree with him", and Kerry is toast for the same reasons he already was going into the debate. He's an idiot; people inherently distrust inconsistent people, and Bush delivered the message twenty times that a person who calls it the wrong war at the wrong place and the wrong time can't lead the nation during that war.
Bush's knockout happened, but Kerry won't be on the mat until election night.
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Kerry LiedWell... His lips were moving.
124
posted on
09/30/2004 10:32:32 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Stop the presses!!!! Kerry lied? Surely you jest!!!
125
posted on
09/30/2004 10:34:01 PM PDT
by
spotbust1
(Gun control is when you use both hands.)
To: elephantman96
What is the Kerry campaign to knock on the President without sounding pessimistic or rude?They are going to release some video spots of the president's facial expressions....
Guess that's the best they can do!
126
posted on
09/30/2004 10:40:26 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: bpjam
A country that took Americans hostage is going to be getting nuclear fuel and technology from US???
I remember that. Clintom gave NKorea oil and nuclear reactor tech and surprise, surprise they're making nuclear weapons - now sKerry wants to do the same for Iran.
Anyone have a link for sKerry's suggestion we give them nuke tech (Iran)? I know its out there ... ;-)
127
posted on
09/30/2004 10:45:19 PM PDT
by
Tunehead54
(John Kerry: Giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the US since 1970!)
To: Porterville
That is really a great description of the situation....
128
posted on
09/30/2004 10:54:43 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Kerry Lied in Debate Well there's a no *****er....
129
posted on
09/30/2004 10:54:48 PM PDT
by
Marie
(~shhhhh...~ The liberals are sleeping....)
To: christie
Bush needed to get across the message that Saddam was harboring terrorist and sponsoring terrorism and that he was more vital to the war on terror than Osama bin Laden. I hope Bush can sometime articulate that having lots of terrorists try to attack us in Iraq presents challenges, but also opportunities; it is certainly better than having them attack us here.
130
posted on
09/30/2004 10:55:48 PM PDT
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
I think that GW and his team decided to let Kerry just go for it during the first 2/3's.
The Republicans have fact checkers vetting every answer, response and utterance that Kerry made tonight.
We will see many of those answers, responses, and utternances in hard hitting ads for our side.
This will set the stage for debates 2 and 3. If Kerry repeats himself re bad answers, responses and utterances in debate #2, he will have defeated himself with his own mouth. Kerry's responses will become great ads for GW.
131
posted on
09/30/2004 10:58:10 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
To: Porterville; ActiveDutyUSMC; dakine; bkwells; chookter; Hacksaw434; thumperusn; Hostel; ...
To: elephantman96
What is the Kerry campaign to knock on the President without sounding pessimistic or rude? Never stopped them before...
133
posted on
09/30/2004 11:09:09 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
("The chair recognizes John Kerry and Ted Kennedy, the Jr. and Sr. Terrorists from Massachusetts.")
To: Chummy
Actually Germany decared war on us first after Pearl Harbor but Saddam had been firing on us in the no fly zone in Iraq and had not adhered to the cease fire agreements...It did not cooperate fully with the UN inspecectors,or heed the UN Resolutions.
134
posted on
09/30/2004 11:09:46 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
To: radicalamericannationalist
135
posted on
09/30/2004 11:11:40 PM PDT
by
wrbones
(Where'd I put my tin foil hat....)
To: MEG33
Actually Germany decared war on us first after Pearl Harbor but Saddam had been firing on us in the no fly zone in Iraq and had not adhered to the cease fire agreements...It did not cooperate fully with the UN inspecectors,or heed the UN Resolutions.I guess kerry was saying that was OK!!!
136
posted on
09/30/2004 11:12:36 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: supercat
It's better than that. Iraq is a magnet. We've drawn many many terrorist into Iraq where we we can fight them. This is not a smart strategy on the part of the terrorist, but brilliant on the part of the coalition. It's hard on Iraqis, it's hard on the perception of winning, but in the long run, we'll take more of them out. More will replace them, but it'll take time for them to regroup and the leadership will no longer find safe haven in Baghdad or Libya.
Maybe there are some security reasons why Bush is not articulating some of this, hard to tell. Or maybe there are some surprises to come and he doesn't want to show his hand. But, personally, I think he's been weak in explaining his case. There is a lot of ammunition he could use.
137
posted on
09/30/2004 11:13:01 PM PDT
by
christie
(John F. Kerry Timeline - http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html)
To: Grampa Dave
If Kerry repeats himself re bad answers, responses and utterances in debate #2, he will have defeated himself with his own mouth. Kerry's responses will become great ads for GW. Indeed, Kerry may be cornered. If he repeats his lie, Bush can challenge it with the truth. If he speaks truth but contradicts his earlier statement, Bush can question him about the earlier statement.
138
posted on
09/30/2004 11:15:32 PM PDT
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: bear11
"WHY WOULD ANYONE SUGGEST WE ELIMINATE ANY WEAPON SYSTEM(NUCLEAR OR OTHERWISE) WHILE WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AND OUR TROOPS ARE IN HARM'S WAY? "
Even worse - he said "why is it okay for US to have nuclear weapons but its not okay for North Korea to have them". (Or something to that affect).
This guy is the typical Liberal. The sad part is that many will agree with him.
139
posted on
09/30/2004 11:21:12 PM PDT
by
geopyg
(Peace..................through decisive and ultimate VICTORY. (Democracy, whiskey, sexy))
To: supercat
Rove, Kerry analysts and GW's team told GW to just hang back in the first 2/3's of the debate and let Kerry say anything that he wanted to say. They probably knew that Kerry had gotten a preview of the questions before hand.
So Kerry was loaded for bear and spewed and spewed.
This was why GW look so poed while he listened to Kerry spew lies and other mantras.
Now those lies and mantras will hammer Skerry until the next debate. If he does the same tactic in the second and third debate, his mouth in the debates will have destroyed him.
140
posted on
09/30/2004 11:22:28 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-211 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson