To: Antoninus
No one is forcing anything on you. Indeed, it is you who are attempting to use force to prevent people from reading or viewing what they so desire. Us "libertines," as you so nastily put it, have a live-and-let-live attitude. You should be free to restrict what you and yours watch and read, but you shouldn't have that power over me.
84 posted on
09/30/2004 3:12:42 PM PDT by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: Junior
No one is forcing anything on you. Indeed, it is you who are attempting to use force to prevent people from reading or viewing what they so desire. Us "libertines," as you so nastily put it, have a live-and-let-live attitude. You should be free to restrict what you and yours watch and read, but you shouldn't have that power over me.
Live and let live. I'm ok, you're ok. Let me be me.
Any other slogans from the 1960s you want to throw out there? Pornography has been considered outside the purview of the the 1st Amendment since it was written. This only changed with the "living constitution" introduced by the geniuses in the 1960s. You can argue that society was somehow improved when porn became a civil right. I find such an argument utterly delusional.
201 posted on
09/30/2004 8:15:31 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Abortion; Euthanasia; Fetal Stem Cell Research; Human Cloning; Homo Marriage - NON-NEGOTIABLE ISSUES)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson