Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus

No one is forcing anything on you. Indeed, it is you who are attempting to use force to prevent people from reading or viewing what they so desire. Us "libertines," as you so nastily put it, have a live-and-let-live attitude. You should be free to restrict what you and yours watch and read, but you shouldn't have that power over me.


84 posted on 09/30/2004 3:12:42 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
No one is forcing anything on you. Indeed, it is you who are attempting to use force to prevent people from reading or viewing what they so desire. Us "libertines," as you so nastily put it, have a live-and-let-live attitude. You should be free to restrict what you and yours watch and read, but you shouldn't have that power over me.

Live and let live. I'm ok, you're ok. Let me be me.

Any other slogans from the 1960s you want to throw out there? Pornography has been considered outside the purview of the the 1st Amendment since it was written. This only changed with the "living constitution" introduced by the geniuses in the 1960s. You can argue that society was somehow improved when porn became a civil right. I find such an argument utterly delusional.
201 posted on 09/30/2004 8:15:31 PM PDT by Antoninus (Abortion; Euthanasia; Fetal Stem Cell Research; Human Cloning; Homo Marriage - NON-NEGOTIABLE ISSUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson