If you consider two pictures of pretty women with all of their clothes on to be pornography being "forced upon" you, I have to wonder what your standards are, and whether you object to - as pornographic - the various pictures of Ann Coulter that are typically seen by the readers of her articles on Free Republic threads.
Saudi Arabia and the Taliban have one possible standard for display of the female image, what's yours?
Personally, Ann's ideas are what I find most attractive about her.
Some in our group of FRiends can't even handle a bare breasted Lady of Justice. That should speak volumes. Blackbird.
What is being "forced" on me is the "in your face" flaunting of the legalization of porn -- the "see what I can legally get away with and you can't stop me" immature, childish, and rude behavior that I've come to expect from the groups who are trying their best to tear down the Christian foundations of this country of ours.
I don't consider the two pictures of these whores to be pornography -- just in bad taste. But I bet you have no idea what I'm talking about, do you?