[binladenforkerry]

Regardless of the glaring skew of Yahoo, doesn't anyone here think it's worth it to "fight back" by rigging the votes of Yahoo articles in a favorable manner to Bush, the war, and just conservative aims in general?

[demlosers]

Usually on line polls are not worth the time.

[JohnnyZ]

Regardless of the glaring skew of Yahoo, doesn't anyone here think it's worth it to "fight back" by rigging the votes of Yahoo articles in a favorable manner to Bush, the war, and just conservative aims in general?

I'm sure plenty of conservatives vote similarly, but I do note a preponderance of libs in the ratings.

[Darksheare]

Nope.
Let the Libs play their games.
The Dan Rather CBS memogate showed THINKING people that the press cannot be trusted.

[Old Sarge]

Yahoo News is all the AP news wire, in any event.

And Socialists are beyond reasoning with, so why waste the bandwidth?

[Conspiracy Guy]

Don't give them the traffic.

[Horatio Gates]

doesn't anyone here think it's worth it to "fight back" by rigging the votes of Yahoo articles in a favorable manner to Bush

Rigging is a Rat tactic and Yahoo news is MSM anyway. Their online opinion "polls" about their stories amount to zilch. BTW it's President Bush.

[weegee]

Not worth fighting it back, there are thousands who modify those ranks. They do it daily and around the clock. I have better ways to spend my time.

Some FReeps are worth the effort, this one is not (at least from me).

Each vote requires a separate Yahoo user account. I don't care to bloat their ranks. I hate Yahoo. They've consumed many good services by buying out smaller companies (especially when it comes to online forums). Screw them and their polls.