Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

On this issue, I think one should realize what a dishonest term "Reproductive Rights" is. Women cannot conceive children without men and therefore before we get into this convoluted discussion about what women are legally allowed to do with their bodies, lets use some sense here. A Pregnancy involves the personal responsiblity of both the man and woman, who together conceive a child. If you look at it this way, you see how absurd the term Reproductive Rights is. Individuals can't have reproductive rights, because human reproduction is not asexual and hence not an individual right. Just my two cents.


66 posted on 09/30/2004 10:08:19 AM PDT by miloklancy (The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miloklancy
Amen! Even if you use assisted reproduction methods there still must be donors! Plus, think of all the expectant fathers who actually WANT to be dads being denied that by selfish women seeking abortions (although I'd say many abortions result because of the attitudes of selfish men not taking responsibility). God has blessed me with an incredible wife, but if she were one of these deluded women thinking that abortion was just another version of a "condom" I'd have her under guard until my baby was born. Once a woman becomes pregnant, life ceases to be "about her" and it is supposed to be about the baby!
169 posted on 09/30/2004 12:18:21 PM PDT by Hawkeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson