I thought I was the only one that didn't know how to post a pic. If you have learned, please tell me.
Go slow and make it simple, I'm a novice.
Go to Hugh Hewitt and read his whole column.
The debate from my perspictive was like a boxing match.
Kerry was clearly the light weight. He had a flurry of punches but he wasn't doing any damage. He peppered and he flailed around. He looked like he was coming out very aggressively but he failed the most important goal of this debate.
He didn't convince anyone that he was likeable.
Bush debated like the heavy weight that he is. He selected his responses carefully and rocked Kerry. He appeared to be getting hammered but he was just brushing away the lesser blows and going for the red meat.
Kerry was debating for judges and Bush was debating for the living rooms of America.
Bush handled himself quite well.
am more surprised by the post analysis than anything; offering that Kerry won or that it was at the least a draw. Worse, even Fox News! (I dropped them a line this morning). Only way to call Kerry a winner is to believe his typical misconstuctions of the truth.
To be impressed by Kerry is to resonate to 'arrogance' as opposed to the power of a genuine humility - a quality of great leadership - and a quality that eliminates Kerry as even a worthy opponent.
Cannot believe the comments today re Kerry's performance; or that he could impress that many people. (Well, I guess I can believe that one. . .)
Bush spoke to the people
I don’t know if the debates last night persuaded undecided voters to vote for either candidate though
I do know that I felt like slapping Kerry. He continually shook his head when President Bush responded to questions
Found myself yelling at the TV
Poor dogs, probably scared them