Skip to comments.
Bush's Top Ten Flip-Flops (CBS)
CBS News ^
| September 28, 2004
| David Paul Kuhn
Posted on 09/29/2004 4:18:56 PM PDT by johannes89a
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Raffus
>> Rather has ... no bran
Great zot! Does this mean that he suffers from ... logorrhea?!?
41
posted on
09/29/2004 4:36:32 PM PDT
by
T'wit
(There is only one form of government -- too much)
To: TomGuy
Just in time for the release of Kerry's commercial attacking Bush over flip-flopping.
What a coincidence. Guess CBS realizes there's no turning back now...
42
posted on
09/29/2004 4:36:41 PM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: MNJohnnie
I would pull their press credentials.
Then I will pull their FCC license.
43
posted on
09/29/2004 4:36:45 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Control the information given to society and you control society.)
To: johannes89a
What they do not get is that no amount of desperate spin can hide the clear daily flip flops of the Kerry camp.
But hey, if CBS News wants to dig themselves even deeper into a hole, let them keep up this clear coordination of their "News" with the DNC Propaganda machine.
44
posted on
09/29/2004 4:36:46 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans)
To: beansox
when will they release the volume set of agent oranges flip-flops... or dont they have enough hours in the day??? In fact, have they even done ONE hit piece on Kerry?
45
posted on
09/29/2004 4:37:25 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
("F" Stands for FLIP-FLOP ...)
To: johannes89a
Warm-up act for tomorrow's debates.
46
posted on
09/29/2004 4:38:04 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Don't tell my mother I work for CBS. She thinks I'm a towel boy at a bordello.)
To: johannes89a
raq and the Sept. 11 Attacks
In a press conference in September 2002, six months before the invasion of Iraq, President Bush said, you can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror... they're both equally as bad, and equally as evil, and equally as destructive.
In September of 2004, Mr. Bush said: We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September 11th." Though he added that there's no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties, the statement seemingly belied earlier assertions that Saddam and al Qaeda were equally bad.
The Sept. 11 commission found there was no evidence Saddam was linked to the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.
That's a lie. bush NEVER said that Hussein was linked to 9-11.
47
posted on
09/29/2004 4:38:10 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: johannes89a
Nation Building and the War in Iraq During the 2000 campaign, George W. Bush argued against nation building and foreign military entanglements. In the second presidential debate, he said: "I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, 'This is the way it's got to be.'"
True, Bush said that.
The United States is currently involved in nation building in Iraq on a scale unseen since the years immediately following World War II.
Not quite, the United States is currently engaged in lancing the Mideast boil and preparing forward operating bases should the need ever arise to wage war against Iran and Syria. Pre 9/11 thought in a post 9/11 world does not obtain.
During the 2000 election, Mr. Bush called for U.S. troops to be withdrawn from the NATO peacekeeping mission in the Balkans. His administration now cites such missions as an example of how America must "stay the course."
He has a point here but I might add that President Clinton committed troops to the Balknas absent UN resolutions and more importantly without an authorization by the US Congress.
48
posted on
09/29/2004 4:38:13 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
To: johannes89a
Who pays any attention to SeeBS?
49
posted on
09/29/2004 4:38:17 PM PDT
by
A. Morgan
( If I wanted to see Horsesh*t, I could go out to the barn and see it for free.)
To: jwalsh07
...and the funny thing is, CBS actually thinks re-iterating this tired old saw about WMD, September 11th, and nation building is going to save their precious 60 Minutes.
Rather should join Kerry and move to France or socialist pot-smoking Canada. The Land of the Free has no room for lies and slanders like these.
To: johannes89a
To: johannes89a
These are not flip flops even by a stretch of the imagination.
That leaves CBS lying again.
52
posted on
09/29/2004 4:40:22 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
To: johannes89a
I think President Bush should demand equal time from CBS to rebut everything they have thrown at him since they are the personal representatives of JFKerry.
53
posted on
09/29/2004 4:40:50 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: T'wit
What I really meant is "brawn". I use a lab top at home when I'm really use to a desk top at work. Since I can't blog at work - I have to settle.
54
posted on
09/29/2004 4:40:57 PM PDT
by
Raffus
(Thanks to all Veterans for their service to our Country.)
To: johannes89a
This is just boring, and a lame swipe at David Letterman for making fun of them.
55
posted on
09/29/2004 4:41:11 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(Troll-Patrol! You've been warned.)
To: johannes89a
Every politcian should be granted the courtesy of changing his mind after considering the facts. To change one's position on an issue is not necessarily a sign of weakness.
But the difference between Bush and Kerry is evident even to a dispassionate observer. The latter changes position for the sake of gaining popularity. The former has the best interests of the United States of America at heart as he considers the big picture.
Kerry is not a mere "flip-flopper." He flips, flops, and flips again. Thank goodness in about one month he will flop for the last time.
To: dalebert
Anyone have an addy for the FCC where we can all wrtie a protest ?
57
posted on
09/29/2004 4:41:36 PM PDT
by
omstrat
(NJ/NYC republican)
To: Gabz
And anyone cares what CBS claims??????????You would do well to care about blatant and false propaganda being presented in the guise of "journalism".
Clearly you already hold the source in disdain. That they continue to behave this way is a matter of import, yes.
58
posted on
09/29/2004 4:42:09 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
To: johannes89a
Oops --- I thought the headline was the 10 different positions Kerry has on Iraq. My bad.
59
posted on
09/29/2004 4:42:21 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: johannes89a
Iraq and the Sept. 11 Attacks In a press conference in September 2002, six months before the invasion of Iraq, President Bush said, you can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror... they're both equally as bad, and equally as evil, and equally as destructive.
A factual statement. Saddam Hussein gave sanctuary to the worst of the worst, Abu Nidal, Abu Abbas, Zarqawi, the PLF and on and on. He also paid bounty for the heads of dead Israelis and Americans killed by islamofascists in Israel. Only a complete moron would fail to note that Hussein was inextricably linked to terrorists.
In September of 2004, Mr. Bush said: We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September 11th." Though he added that there's no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties, the statement seemingly belied earlier assertions that Saddam and al Qaeda were equally bad.
This is simply a logical fallacy that a two year old could identify and debunk.
The Sept. 11 commission found there was no evidence Saddam was linked to the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.
Which is exactly the position the Bush administration has always taken. There is lots of evidence that Hussein and Iraq were involved with the first WTC bombing however.
60
posted on
09/29/2004 4:43:05 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson