Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader Off Ohio Election Ballot, Blackwell Cites Forged Signatures On Petitions
Channel 5, Cincinnati ^ | Sep 28, 2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 09/28/2004 5:35:11 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio's secretary of state says Ralph Nader won't be on the state's presidential ballot because of forged signatures on petition forms and petitions circulated by non-Ohioans.

Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell says today the independent candidate was short of the 5,000 valid signature required to qualify.

Blackwell, a Republican, said Nader's backers wound up with 3,700 valid signatures.

They had turned in nearly 15,000 signatures, but about 6,400 were declared valid after review by local elections boards. An additional 2,700 were invalidated following a hearing last week at Blackwell's office.

Democrats blame Nader's presence on the ballot in Florida in 2000 for costing Al Gore the election. They say they're happy with Blackwell's ruling.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ballotaccess; democratscheat; nader
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2004 5:35:12 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I wonder how many of them were signed by Lt Col Jerry Killian.


2 posted on 09/28/2004 5:37:12 PM PDT by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Mike Fieschko

All I know is the few Nader petitions I sent in were legit.


4 posted on 09/28/2004 5:38:02 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Day 20, and the pajamahadeen still demands Dan Rather be fired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Is the Ohio State Sec. a democrap?


5 posted on 09/28/2004 5:40:21 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Nader has had to spend most of his money just to get onto ballots. The only thing more dangerous than a third party candidate with his own agenda is a third party candidate with you as his only agenda. Hate is a two way street. Another great move by the Rats.


6 posted on 09/28/2004 5:40:59 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (I volunteer to instruct JFK on the meaning of a purple heart!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Dems all for free speech, but they want Nadar off - why one asks? Liberals are a load (and I have a LOT of experience with them!)


7 posted on 09/28/2004 5:41:00 PM PDT by Raffus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Mr. Blackwell the fashion critic? Ivy League is so passe.


8 posted on 09/28/2004 5:41:29 PM PDT by jimfree (Judge not lest ye be judged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

No, he is a very good black Republican who also has disallowed a bunch of new voter registrations which were not on the correct paper stock (likely were Dem frauds)...


9 posted on 09/28/2004 5:42:02 PM PDT by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Is the Ohio State Sec. a democrap?

No! He is the most conservative Republican we have in Ohio.

If Ken says they are fakes, sadly they are fakes.

10 posted on 09/28/2004 5:42:10 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Day 20, and the pajamahadeen still demands Dan Rather be fired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Let the Fraud Begin!

Why do I believe the DNC is somehow involved here?
11 posted on 09/28/2004 5:42:52 PM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

The documents were forged, but the intent of the people signing them is clear: they want Nader on the ballot. Therefore, Nader should be allowed on the Ohio ballot...

at least if you're following the usual leftist train of thought..


12 posted on 09/28/2004 5:45:42 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
5,000 valid signature required to qualify.
Nader's backers wound up with 3,700 valid signatures.
but about 6,400 were declared valid after review by local elections boards.

when is 3,700 + 6,400 not greater then 5,000?

13 posted on 09/28/2004 5:45:50 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("Never argue with a fool, some people won't be able to tell the difference" - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

So then....there is now proof that liberals try to steal elections.

They may need the Ohio State Sec. in Iowa.


14 posted on 09/28/2004 5:46:04 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
They may need the Ohio State Sec. in Iowa.

And we need Mr. Blackwell in as Ohio governor in 2006.

15 posted on 09/28/2004 5:47:43 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Day 20, and the pajamahadeen still demands Dan Rather be fired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

That Stinks !!! We were enjoying having Ralph on the ballot. But do not dispair - W will win Ohio without Ralph's help.


16 posted on 09/28/2004 5:52:53 PM PDT by Martins kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Betcha Democrats sabotaged ole ralphie boy's petition drive.


17 posted on 09/28/2004 5:56:38 PM PDT by Cosmo (I'm the pajamahadeen, and I vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Martins kid

This is both good and bad. Assuming Nader is indeed off the Ohio ballot, it means that he will spend more time in other states where he will cause Lurch even more damage -- Minnesota and Wisconsin, for starters.

Assuming Bush will win Ohio comfortably, this may be net good news.


18 posted on 09/28/2004 5:59:49 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

"when is 3,700 + 6,400 not greater then 5,000?"



The 15,000 signatures were pared to 6,400 after local election board scrutiny. Ken Blackwell then found that 2,700 of those were fraudulent and cut the number of valid signatures to 3,700, which is 1,300 short.

We need to start spreading the word that Naderites can still vote for Nader by writing in his name regardless of his ballot status. In Georgia in 2000, Nader got 13,432 votes (0.52% of the total) as a write in---Nader actually got 2,500 more votes than Pat Buchanan, who was on the ballot.


19 posted on 09/28/2004 6:03:28 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

Democrat situational tactics will come back to roost every time. Is there anything problematic for them that they can't judge shop for as a solution? A solution which they then later will need reversed in order to support the next need to obfuscate the law.


20 posted on 09/28/2004 6:06:57 PM PDT by blackdog (I survived John Dupont's wrestling camp and all I got was a lousy tee shirt and a prolapse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson