To: bagman
"I've been saying since the Spring that Kerry will finish behind Bush and Nader in at least two states."
Umm, no he won't. Nader didn't get to double digits in any state in 2000, and he certainly won't in 2004.
30 posted on
09/28/2004 9:26:03 AM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Gore, believe or not, was a better candidate than Kerry. Kerry cannot reconcile the disparate opinions of the Democrats. The last several weeks will be deadly for him as the anti-Bush faction (whose numbers are legion) realize that Kerry is not going to win; they then desert him and vote their consciences with Nader.
We'll know soon enough which of us is correct.
61 posted on
09/28/2004 9:58:10 AM PDT by
bagman
To: AuH2ORepublican
The President
COULD get over 90% of the vote in two states so that
COULD set up Kerry to come in behind Nader without violating the "double digit" rule.
And, while it's improbable, I'm going to daydream about it, especially since I don't seem to be able to do anything else today without setting off my allergies.
103 posted on
09/28/2004 11:45:37 AM PDT by
Duke Nukum
([T]he only true mystery is that our very lives are governed by dead people.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson