Skip to comments.
Syria-U.S. Relationship Facing 'Major Deterioration' [says senior U.S. government official today]
American Forces Press Service ^
| Sep 27, 2004
| Jim Garamone
Posted on 09/27/2004 6:43:33 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Mike Fieschko
2
posted on
09/27/2004 6:45:27 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Mike Fieschko
3
posted on
09/27/2004 6:45:51 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: Mike Fieschko
Im telling you Syria is too externally focused, we need to change that focus to a more internal focus. We do this by just making it hard to exist in syria, remove 25% of their infrastructure, Water, Electricity,trade. That should get them to transfer some of their resources.
To: Walkingfeather
We can leave that stuff alone, as long as we get 100% of the Muslims.
5
posted on
09/27/2004 6:49:11 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
To: Walkingfeather
That should get them to transfer some of their resources.
Perhaps even an item or two belonging to Saddam?
6
posted on
09/27/2004 6:50:10 PM PDT
by
Chummy
("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
To: Mike Fieschko
"Institutions within Syria are actively colluding with our enemies in Iraq."
7
posted on
09/27/2004 6:50:36 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
To: Mike Fieschko
Damascus in December! RAH!
8
posted on
09/27/2004 6:51:58 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: Mike Fieschko
9
posted on
09/27/2004 6:52:36 PM PDT
by
Ed_in_NJ
(I'm in old skivvies and New Jersey, and I approved this message.)
To: thoughtomator
Syria: is either FOR us or AGAINST us.
To: Mike Fieschko
"If Americans are dying in Iraq because of Syrian policies, then this is something we are not going to tolerate," he said.Making a list and checkin' it twice...Gonna find out who's naughty and nice.
Uncle Sam's comin' to town
To: Mike Fieschko
Hmm... You mean we're going to have a real foreign policy? I like it...
"You screw with us... We stop being nice."
12
posted on
09/27/2004 6:54:12 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: coconutt2000
We ought to start a betting pool. Assuming Bush is elected, who is going to get hit first...Syria or Iran. Im not necessarily talking major military operation, could be spec ops targeted strikes.
13
posted on
09/27/2004 6:56:56 PM PDT
by
Dat Mon
(clever tagline under construction)
To: Dat Mon
I think we ought to be more "sensitive" about Syria. Let's wait for them to attack us and only then we'll send the LAPD to investigate.
To: Dat Mon
Neither.... I'm betting that after Bush is reelected, both of them will back off of Iraq, and the militia terrorists will be left to their own devices, or they'll have to turn to an organization like Al Qaeda for funding and supplies.
The people assisting the enemy are not fighting to win in Iraq, as much as they are fighting to affect American foreign policy for the next 4 years. I only wish more Americans would realize that.
15
posted on
09/27/2004 7:02:55 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Mike Fieschko
I think that the offing of that Hamas leader in Lebanon is part of this chess game (i.e., your border can be porous in both directions).
16
posted on
09/27/2004 7:04:33 PM PDT
by
XEHRpa
To: coconutt2000
this is what i would expect
they understand the influence they have if they can impact the election by ramping up the pressure for a few months
the kerry/lockhart comments are helping to fuel this perception
To: Mike Fieschko

Delivery for President Bashar Asad! Mr Asad!
18
posted on
09/27/2004 7:10:50 PM PDT
by
airborne
(God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
To: Mike Fieschko
I forecast this scenario about 4 months ago:
US puts out the word that we are increasingly angry at Syria for continued infiltration of insurgents into Iraq. Then, in a lightning raid ostensibly to counter a buildup of insurgents intending to sneak into Iraq, Special Forces uncovers a motherlode of WMD's.
The US then states that this is sufficient justification to maintain presence at the site - and rapidly moves in ground forces to occupy the area while covering them with massive air power. The UN and MSM idiots are invited in to look at the WMD's with their own shifty little eyes, while we whack away on their dumb asses with a rolled-up copy of the Sunday New York Times. Liberals stammer and stagger under the weight of the goalposts they attempt to drag to a new location.
We are halfway there already.....
19
posted on
09/27/2004 7:11:48 PM PDT
by
guitfiddlist
(The Left is smart enough to know the truth, but low enough not to care.)
To: Dat Mon
We ought to start a betting pool. Assuming Bush is elected, who is going to get hit first...Syria or Iran. Iran. First week in December or somewhere close to that...
Nuke plant(s) go down. We may embargo first.
THIS IS NEWLAND AND I APPROVE OF THIS PREDICTION.
20
posted on
09/27/2004 7:16:17 PM PDT
by
NewLand
(Pajama Patriot on patrol for Libs, Lies, and Liars!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson