Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2004 3:45:18 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ambrose; sweetliberty

Pinging sweetliberty.


2 posted on 09/27/2004 3:46:12 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Save Terri Schiavo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Yep, as usual the Dems say their electorate is too darn ignorant to know the rules. Voting should not be a lowest common denominator activity. The rules (including the instructions on the ballot!) are the last bastion against the mentally incompetent, woefully ignorant and flat out stupid.
4 posted on 09/27/2004 3:52:15 PM PDT by WileyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Why would anyone interested in an honest vote argue against anything less than ID shown at every vote?
6 posted on 09/27/2004 3:57:52 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
is it law that you have to carry ID? What is the big deal... show your license when you vote. The dems have a problem... all of their voters are dead or are fake...
7 posted on 09/27/2004 3:59:39 PM PDT by dubie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

In Florida you need two forms of ID, a voter registration card and photo id.

If you show up without them, there is some provision ballot you can fill out, but those ballots are highly scrutinized for authenticity.

If you don't have a photo ID, you can get one from the driver's license bureau without getting a license.


8 posted on 09/27/2004 4:05:24 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

It's a no-brainer that one of the best ways to prevent voter fraud is to require voters to present ID at the polls, yet Dems always oppose this - I wonder why?


9 posted on 09/27/2004 4:23:53 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
"And Democrats are falling back on a longstanding argument against voter ID: that it tends to disenfranchise poor, rural, student, Hispanic and Indian voters. "

Nobody cares about that arguement anymore, except politicians who think that Dan Rather is the bomb.

11 posted on 09/27/2004 7:45:32 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Kerry is a traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Secretary of State Rebecca Vigil-Giron, a Democrat and the state's top elections official, says the 2003 law does not require those first-time voters to show ID at the polls.

What she is actually saying is - "You can't disenfranchize our illegal voters!"

12 posted on 09/27/2004 8:30:09 PM PDT by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose


Please Pass Emergency Anti-Vote Fraud Measure Immediately!

Vote fraud threatens the very core of our republic, and it directly threatens our sovereignty

Please send the following message to your Congressmen and Senators:

Please pass, on an expedited basis, emergency legislation to require voters to show ID at all polling places on Election Day.

Vote fraud threatens the very core of our republic, and it directly threatens our sovereignty. There is a significant amount of evidence emerging that evinces a wide-spread plot to engage in massive voter fraud. Thus, Congress must take immediate action to counter this potential menace.

Congress has the express power to dictate the time, place, and manner in which federal elections are held. The congressional power to make or alter time, place, or manner of federal elections extends to the regulation of voter registration. Federal regulation of the electoral processes, including the regulation of federal voter registration, is also consistent with the Tenth Amendment and permissible; although states do have broad discretion to enact and implement registration procedures, states may not transgress the Constitution. It follows that state voter registration and Election Day statutes that are inconsistent with federal voter registration and Election Day mandates are preempted.

As per the Federal Court in Byrd v. Brice, the government may require a voter to furnish proof of identity at the polling place on Election Day. Such a measure would go a long way in protecting citizens’ federal voting rights from fraudulent practices.

Please set to work immediately on enacting emergency legislation to require a valid ID at the polling places on Election Day.

http://capwiz.com/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=6486121&content_dir=ua_congressorg&mailid=custom


13 posted on 10/09/2004 8:25:52 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior ( ~ WE MUST STOP VOTING FRAUD THIS ELECTION!!! ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson