Miller is being forced to reveal her sources of information relevant to Plame's outing. Plame's occupation is considered classified information by the government...whether or not you agree. You mean you really can't see that you're applying one standard to Novak and another to Miller? You can't think at all. LOL...a fool's cackle.
Are you asserting Wilson did a legitimate investigation and accurately represented his findings?
Yes.
But I can't be sure and neither can you since his instructions have never been made public, nor has his report, nor the reports of the Ambassador to Niger or of General Fulford.
Absurd.
How would you know? Your grasp of reality is so limited.
"But I can't be sure and neither can you since his instructions have never been made public, nor has his report, nor the reports of the Ambassador to Niger or of General Fulford."
Joe Wilson said that he did not know who sent him to investigate "yellowcake" and he would not know them if he met them on the street.
HELLO!!!!!
It may be the information she has is more to do with the type of investigation that is normally conducted in the area of inquiry Wilson claims to have conducted, and other matters in that area, not Plame's "outing" per se.
Plame's occupation is considered classified information by the government...whether or not you agree.
It's not a matter of agreeing. It is a matter you are in no position to state authoritatively. There is evidence it was not classified, so we shall see.
You mean you really can't see that you're applying one standard to Novak and another to Miller? You can't think at all. LOL...a fool's cackle.
I don't see Miller and Novak's roles as the same since Miller didn't write an article explaining how and why Wilson was sent off to Niger. I have said nothing derogatory about Miller. I've been plain that I don't see any evidence she has done anything wrong, nor has Novak. How you conclude that is applying a different standard is beyond me. Cackle all day long, but you failed to explain this line of "reasoning".
Yes.
But I can't be sure and neither can you since his instructions have never been made public, nor has his report, nor the reports of the Ambassador to Niger or of General Fulford.
Are you not aware that the 9/11 Commission (even they) found Wilson's representations to be false? My observation that standing by the position that Wilson was forthright and honest in his representation of his trip is an absurd one is accurate.
Telling someone about his trip over a plateful of Chinese food at a hole in the wall restaurant does not qualify as "a report."