It may be the information she has is more to do with the type of investigation that is normally conducted in the area of inquiry Wilson claims to have conducted, and other matters in that area, not Plame's "outing" per se.
Plame's occupation is considered classified information by the government...whether or not you agree.
It's not a matter of agreeing. It is a matter you are in no position to state authoritatively. There is evidence it was not classified, so we shall see.
You mean you really can't see that you're applying one standard to Novak and another to Miller? You can't think at all. LOL...a fool's cackle.
I don't see Miller and Novak's roles as the same since Miller didn't write an article explaining how and why Wilson was sent off to Niger. I have said nothing derogatory about Miller. I've been plain that I don't see any evidence she has done anything wrong, nor has Novak. How you conclude that is applying a different standard is beyond me. Cackle all day long, but you failed to explain this line of "reasoning".
Yes.
But I can't be sure and neither can you since his instructions have never been made public, nor has his report, nor the reports of the Ambassador to Niger or of General Fulford.
Are you not aware that the 9/11 Commission (even they) found Wilson's representations to be false? My observation that standing by the position that Wilson was forthright and honest in his representation of his trip is an absurd one is accurate.
I can't make any sense of this. Perhaps if you elaborated...
It's not a matter of agreeing. It is a matter you are in no position to state authoritatively.
At this point it's considered classified. That's why there's such an elaborate investigation.
I've been plain that I don't see any evidence she has done anything wrong, nor has Novak
So the entire investigation is nonsense...simply because you believe that Plame's occupation was not classified? Meanwhile, however, Miller will certainly go to jail if she doesn't reveal her sources.